2001
DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200108000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Neuropsychological Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract: Neuropsychological recovery after TBI is not uniform across individuals and neuropsychological domains. For a subset of persons with moderate to severe TBI, neuropsychological recovery may continue several years after injury with substantial recovery. For other persons, measurable impairment remains 5 years after injury. Improvement was most apparent on measures of cognitive speed, visuoconstruction, and verbal memory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
225
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 390 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
225
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…First, since individuals with TBI are not a heterogeneous group in terms of injury severity and degree of impairment caused by TBI, HLM permits the study of life satisfaction trajectories by TBI severity (e.g., mild, moderate, and severe). Particular attention should be paid to cognitive functioning that appears to show improvement over time (e.g., over a 5-year period: cognitive speed, visuoconstruction, and verbal memory; Millis et al, 2001). The possible relations of cognitive changes to functional ability, community integration, and social mobility warrant rigorous scrutiny with the best available and contemporary methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, since individuals with TBI are not a heterogeneous group in terms of injury severity and degree of impairment caused by TBI, HLM permits the study of life satisfaction trajectories by TBI severity (e.g., mild, moderate, and severe). Particular attention should be paid to cognitive functioning that appears to show improvement over time (e.g., over a 5-year period: cognitive speed, visuoconstruction, and verbal memory; Millis et al, 2001). The possible relations of cognitive changes to functional ability, community integration, and social mobility warrant rigorous scrutiny with the best available and contemporary methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly reported ailments by patients following TBI are cognitive in nature and consist of persistent deficits in both learning and memory, which are manifest in the inability to acquire new information (Horneman and Emanuelson, 2009). Thus these individuals tend to become easily confused and forgetful, and many complain of an inability to organize thoughts or acquire spatial awareness, which subsequently delays their reintegration into society (Binder, 1996;Millis et al, 2001). The acute and chronic medical and rehabilitative care required because of these TBI-induced deficits, along with the loss of productivity, results in injury-related costs that exceed $50 billion per year (Max et al, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9] Though functional connectivity of the DMN has been studied widely in a variety of clinical populations, a relatively small literature base exists in moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), for which longterm neuropsychological outcomes are heterogeneous and therefore difficult to predict. 10,11 The delineation of intrinsic connectivity alterations after TBI may shed light on enduring functional changes affecting cognitive status in the remote future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%