1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3300734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term connexin-mediated bystander effect in highly tumorigenic human cells in vivo in herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir gene therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, in cells with poor gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC), a bystander effect by GCV was enhanced after transfection and expression of gap junction protein genes including that encoding connexin 43 (Mesnil et al, 1996). The HeLa cells used in the present study do not communicate well by gap junction, and thus the bystander effect is limited (Duflot-Dancer et al, 1998). In spite of poor GJIC, both ACV and GCV exerted dose-dependent bystander killing in HeLa cells in the present study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In fact, in cells with poor gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC), a bystander effect by GCV was enhanced after transfection and expression of gap junction protein genes including that encoding connexin 43 (Mesnil et al, 1996). The HeLa cells used in the present study do not communicate well by gap junction, and thus the bystander effect is limited (Duflot-Dancer et al, 1998). In spite of poor GJIC, both ACV and GCV exerted dose-dependent bystander killing in HeLa cells in the present study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Indeed this dose produced cell growth inhibition equivalent to that of 3 Gy without the switch, resulting in an exceptionally high radiation dose modifying factor of approximately 4. Whilst a suicide gene is likely to elicit the greatest killing effect in the cells that are induced to express it, we expect that more extensive and widespread prodrug-mediated cell killing would be achieved under in vivo conditions where local (connexinmediated) [24][25][26] or systemic (immune system-mediated) [27][28][29] bystander effects and cytotoxicity synergies 22 will occur. The possibility that the prodrug activating protein could be expressed as a fusion protein with a cellular transporter such as VP22 30 to exploit the sustained expression of the switched vector further, might also be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gap junctional communication, for instance, can be enhanced by regulating the production of connexins (Cx), membrane proteins considered to be the building blocks of gap junctions and the major factors responsible for the gap junctionmediated bystander phenomenon (Mesnil and Yamasaki, 2000). The transfer of Cx-encoding genes (Cx43, Cx32, Cx40) or chemically induced Cx-overexpression has been shown in tissue culture (in vitro) (Elshami et al, 1996;Ghoumari et al, 1998;Kunishige et al, 1998;Carystinos, et al, 1999;Andrade-Rozental et al, 2000) and in vivo (Dilber et al, 1997;Park et al, 1997;Du¯ot-Dancer et al, 1998;Touraine et al, 1998) to increase intercellular communication and the transfer of toxic agents. It is important to notice that in some human tumour cells not only expression but also correct surface localisation of Cx43 are necessary components of the bystander effect (McMasters et al, 1998), and that Cx-cotransfection appears not be applicable to all tumour systems (Cirenei et al, 1998).…”
Section: The Bystander Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%