MILCOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Military Communications Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2008.4753059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long range real-time underwater acoustic communication at low bit rate with channel coding protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the Matlab code corresponding to the proposed simulator is available at http://perso.telecom-bretagne.eu/fxsocheleau/software. b Note that the peak sidelobe of the aperiodic correlation of this sequence is 3, b refer to [21] for more details…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the Matlab code corresponding to the proposed simulator is available at http://perso.telecom-bretagne.eu/fxsocheleau/software. b Note that the peak sidelobe of the aperiodic correlation of this sequence is 3, b refer to [21] for more details…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 to 20 dB), this channel should make it possible to communicate at a rate of at least 2 to 3 bits/sec/Hz. This means that for channels similar to the one considered here, there is still a significant possible bitrate improvement with respect to existing SISO high data rate modems that usually operate around 1 bit/sec/Hz [23], [24]. Similarly, this also means that there should be a 5 to 10 dB margin between what is implemented today and the ultimate theoretical limits.…”
Section: B Achievable Rates Over An Experimental Doubly Selective Rimentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Many proposals are trying to deal with this problem from different perspectives, for instance trying to minimize the end-to-end latency, increase the throughput, increase the link reliability, optimize synchronization, and increase the network efficiency. Although all these results are useful to improve the network performance, none of them ensure an upper-bounded message delay [ 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%