1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00166-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-latency reflexes in contracted hand and foot muscles and their relations to somatosensory evoked potentials and transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Involvement of a transcortical pathway is constrained by afferent and efferent conduction times and cortical processing delay. Afferent conduction time as found by measuring somatosensory evoked potentials after wrist perturbations is 25-30 ms [11,12] and cortical processing delay for upper extremity is estimated at 10 ms [13]. Combined with a mean efferent motor conduction delay (measured as MEP latency) of 17.5 ms, a transcortical pathway may affect the stretch reflex from approximately 55 ms onwards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Involvement of a transcortical pathway is constrained by afferent and efferent conduction times and cortical processing delay. Afferent conduction time as found by measuring somatosensory evoked potentials after wrist perturbations is 25-30 ms [11,12] and cortical processing delay for upper extremity is estimated at 10 ms [13]. Combined with a mean efferent motor conduction delay (measured as MEP latency) of 17.5 ms, a transcortical pathway may affect the stretch reflex from approximately 55 ms onwards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Taking into account earlier research into conduction times of upper extremity muscles (e.g. wrist), cortical involvement might be present from 50 to 60 ms after stretch onset and onwards: 25-30 ms efferent conduction [11,12]; 10 ms cortical processing [13] and 15-20 ms afferent (motor) conduction [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Last, the glabrous skin of the hand has a propensity for inducing experience-dependent plasticity within SI [18,19] whereas hairy skin, as seen in the lower limb, does not [20]. Further evidence is also found in humans such that a greater number of cortical synapses are involved in the processing of upper limb versus lower limb afferent input [21] thereby increasing the opportunity to modify afferent processing originating from the upper limb. Last, plasticity induced by the lower limb is not identical to that induced by other non-upper limb areas, such as the face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long latency reflex (LLR) of hand muscle can be elicited by electrical stimulation of digital nerves and mixed nerve (3–14). LLR consists of afferent and efferent components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we can apply LLR to assess the integrity of the sensory and motor system (3, 7, 12, 14). A further measurement of cortical relay time (CRT) of LLR would help evaluate the brain connection between sensory and motor areas (8, 10, 13, 14). Here, we assessed the CRT of LLR of 2 AMN patients in whom the brain magnetic resonance imaging did not show any significant abnormalities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%