Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Locomotor training for walking after spinal cord injury
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
36
8
5
0
Citation Types
1
22
0
0
Year Published
Range
2000
20002025
2025Publication Types
Select...
37
8
2
1
Relationship
0
48
Authors
Journals
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
References 36 publications
1
22
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A total of 4 RCTs with 222 patients subsequently found no statistically significant effect of locomotor training on walking with BWSTT in a Cochrane analysis, or with the addition of functional electrical stimulation or robotic assists after SCI. 31 The same lack of efficacy was reported in a Cochrane analysis of stroke. 8 Pilot studies offered clues about the potential of combining BWSTT with co-interventions, but this information has not been incorporated into subsequent pilot studies.…”
Section: Problems
supporting
confidence: 53%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A total of 4 RCTs with 222 patients subsequently found no statistically significant effect of locomotor training on walking with BWSTT in a Cochrane analysis, or with the addition of functional electrical stimulation or robotic assists after SCI. 31 The same lack of efficacy was reported in a Cochrane analysis of stroke. 8 Pilot studies offered clues about the potential of combining BWSTT with co-interventions, but this information has not been incorporated into subsequent pilot studies.…”
Section: Problems
supporting
confidence: 53%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Therefore, RAR combined with CPT offers some valuable clinical benefits. Contrarily, other studies showed no significant difference between RAR and CPT [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 40 ]. Therefore, further investigation is necessary to find additional strategies to RAR that may further promote rehabilitation outcome achievement.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 89%
Do Robotics and Virtual Reality Add Real Progress to Mirror Therapy Rehabilitation? A Scoping Review
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…When there is effect of robot-assisted training, the quality of evidence is very low or low for improving arm functions after stroke [ 102 ] or moderate for improving independent walking in people after stroke [ 103 ]. Researchers who have conducted systematic reviews on the topic suggest that the effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy is more due to the high intensity of training than to the treatment modality [ 102 – 106 ]: “ it seems unlikely that therapy provided by robots will lead to better results than therapy provided by humans under the premise that intensity, amount and frequency of therapy are exactly comparable ” [ 104 ]. In the specific field of robotic mirror therapy, Burgar et al give weight to this hypothesis [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A total of 4 RCTs with 222 patients subsequently found no statistically significant effect of locomotor training on walking with BWSTT in a Cochrane analysis, or with the addition of functional electrical stimulation or robotic assists after SCI. 31 The same lack of efficacy was reported in a Cochrane analysis of stroke. 8 Pilot studies offered clues about the potential of combining BWSTT with co-interventions, but this information has not been incorporated into subsequent pilot studies.…”
Section: Problems
supporting
confidence: 53%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Therefore, RAR combined with CPT offers some valuable clinical benefits. Contrarily, other studies showed no significant difference between RAR and CPT [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 40 ]. Therefore, further investigation is necessary to find additional strategies to RAR that may further promote rehabilitation outcome achievement.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 89%
Do Robotics and Virtual Reality Add Real Progress to Mirror Therapy Rehabilitation? A Scoping Review
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…When there is effect of robot-assisted training, the quality of evidence is very low or low for improving arm functions after stroke [ 102 ] or moderate for improving independent walking in people after stroke [ 103 ]. Researchers who have conducted systematic reviews on the topic suggest that the effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy is more due to the high intensity of training than to the treatment modality [ 102 – 106 ]: “ it seems unlikely that therapy provided by robots will lead to better results than therapy provided by humans under the premise that intensity, amount and frequency of therapy are exactly comparable ” [ 104 ]. In the specific field of robotic mirror therapy, Burgar et al give weight to this hypothesis [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…A total of 4 RCTs with 222 patients subsequently found no statistically significant effect of locomotor training on walking with BWSTT in a Cochrane analysis, or with the addition of functional electrical stimulation or robotic assists after SCI. 31 The same lack of efficacy was reported in a Cochrane analysis of stroke. 8 Pilot studies offered clues about the potential of combining BWSTT with co-interventions, but this information has not been incorporated into subsequent pilot studies.…”
Section: Problems
supporting
confidence: 53%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Therefore, RAR combined with CPT offers some valuable clinical benefits. Contrarily, other studies showed no significant difference between RAR and CPT [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 40 ]. Therefore, further investigation is necessary to find additional strategies to RAR that may further promote rehabilitation outcome achievement.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 89%
Do Robotics and Virtual Reality Add Real Progress to Mirror Therapy Rehabilitation? A Scoping Review
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…When there is effect of robot-assisted training, the quality of evidence is very low or low for improving arm functions after stroke [ 102 ] or moderate for improving independent walking in people after stroke [ 103 ]. Researchers who have conducted systematic reviews on the topic suggest that the effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy is more due to the high intensity of training than to the treatment modality [ 102 – 106 ]: “ it seems unlikely that therapy provided by robots will lead to better results than therapy provided by humans under the premise that intensity, amount and frequency of therapy are exactly comparable ” [ 104 ]. In the specific field of robotic mirror therapy, Burgar et al give weight to this hypothesis [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%