2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locking-free variational formulations and isogeometric analysis for the Timoshenko beam models of strain gradient and classical elasticity

Abstract: The Timoshenko beam bending problem is formulated in the context of strain gradient elasticity for both static and dynamic analysis. Two non-standard variational formulations in the Sobolev space framework are presented in order to avoid the numerical shear locking effect pronounced in the strain gradient context. Both formulations are shown to be reducible to their locking-free counterparts of classical elasticity. Conforming Galerkin discretizations for numerical results are obtained by an isogeometric C p−1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that we have not observed any locking phenomenon in the presented codes. It could be interesting to compare our physically based discretisation with that presented in Balobanov and Niiranen, which has the same interesting property. Remarkable are the results presented in Yaghoubi et al We will accept the challenge to produce simulations based on Hencky‐type discretisation, which can reproduce the dynamical effects which cited papers allows to treat in the dynamical case.…”
Section: Closing Remarks and Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We remark that we have not observed any locking phenomenon in the presented codes. It could be interesting to compare our physically based discretisation with that presented in Balobanov and Niiranen, which has the same interesting property. Remarkable are the results presented in Yaghoubi et al We will accept the challenge to produce simulations based on Hencky‐type discretisation, which can reproduce the dynamical effects which cited papers allows to treat in the dynamical case.…”
Section: Closing Remarks and Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is well known that, in the classical Timoshenko formulations in terms of deflection and rotation, shear energy due to shear strain (i.e., the difference between rotation and gradient of deflection) leads to the socalled numerical shear locking phenomena in standard finite element methods. Traditionally, shear locking has been avoided by introducing reduced numerical integration for the shear term, whereas recently the problem has been overcome by reformulations based on change of variables, for both Timoshenko beams and Reissner-Mindlin plates [44,45]. The present three-variable formulation (2), with shear strain of the form ϕ − θ, should not be prone to numerical locking either.…”
Section: Kinematics and Deformation Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these contributions focus on model derivations and analytical solutions for academic benchmark problems without enlarging the domain of practical applications, including numerical methods enabling the analysis of complex systems beyond the simplest benchmarks. Some exceptions can be found in [25,26,27], and this contribution is aimed to serve as another point of view in this direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%