2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11425-008-0046-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local structure-preserving algorithms for partial differential equations

Abstract: In this paper, we discuss the concept of local structure-preserving algorithms (SPAs) for partial differential equations, which are the natural generalization of the corresponding global SPAs. Local SPAs for the problems with proper boundary conditions are global SPAs, but the inverse is not necessarily valid. The concept of the local SPAs can explain the difference between different SPAs and provide a basic theory for analyzing and constructing high performance SPAs. Furthermore, it enlarges the applicable sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other approach is based on a reformulation of the Hamiltonian PDE into a multi-symplectic form, which provides the PDE with three local conservation laws: the multi-symplectic conservation law, the energy conservation and the momentum conservation law [10,11,12]. Then one may consider methods that preserve the local conservation laws, see for example [13]. These locally defined properties are not dependent on the choice of boundary conditions, giving the methods that preserve local energy an advantage over methods that preserve a global energy, especially since local conservation laws will always lead to global conservation laws whenever periodic boundary conditions are considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other approach is based on a reformulation of the Hamiltonian PDE into a multi-symplectic form, which provides the PDE with three local conservation laws: the multi-symplectic conservation law, the energy conservation and the momentum conservation law [10,11,12]. Then one may consider methods that preserve the local conservation laws, see for example [13]. These locally defined properties are not dependent on the choice of boundary conditions, giving the methods that preserve local energy an advantage over methods that preserve a global energy, especially since local conservation laws will always lead to global conservation laws whenever periodic boundary conditions are considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can get multi-symplectic algorithms, local energy-preserving algorithms, and local momentum-preserving algorithms in this way. 37 The other one is called method of lines, which first discrete the PDE in spatial direction to yield a semi-discrete Hamiltonian ODEs and then integrate the resulted ODEs by some proper structure-preserving algorithm. Nevertheless, no method is mature to ensure the generated ODEs to be Hamiltonian, especially the canonical Hamiltonian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By introducing some variables, the RLW‐type equation can be recast as a first‐order form of true{ left 1 2 u t + a 2 u x + p x = 0 , left u t = w , u x = v , φ x = u , left 1 2 φ t δ 2 v t + a 2 φ x δ 2 w x = p F ( u ) , where F t ( u ) / u t can be used instead of F ( u ) . Simple derivations yield a local energy conservation law (LECL) true( F ( u ) + a u 2 / 2 true) t ( a φ t u / 2 + φ t p + δ w u t / 2 ) x = 0. As the LECL is independent of boundary conditions, it is more essential than the global one (appropriate boundary conditions result in the global ECL I 3 ). Naturally, we want to know whether there exists a scheme preserving the LECL in the discrete sense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the LECL is independent of boundary conditions, it is more essential than the global one [21] (appropriate boundary conditions result in the global ECL I 3 ). Naturally, we want to know whether there exists a scheme preserving the LECL in the discrete sense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%