2018
DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2018.1473778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Gaussian Process Model for Large-Scale Dynamic Computer Experiments

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A natural variation may be to allow elements of the local path (or set) to be treated differentially, say by weighting. Such an extension may prove useful in modeling dynamic computer simulations via local GPs (Zhang et al, 2016), replacing hard clusterings with weights, say. Another would be to augment the criterion defined in Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural variation may be to allow elements of the local path (or set) to be treated differentially, say by weighting. Such an extension may prove useful in modeling dynamic computer simulations via local GPs (Zhang et al, 2016), replacing hard clusterings with weights, say. Another would be to augment the criterion defined in Eq.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the resultant expected improvement criteria would change, and in fact, one may not even end up with a closed form expression of the final design criterion for selecting follow-up points. Future work also include the application of the proposed contour estimation-based sequential design approaches for global fitting for computer experiments with both qualitative and quantitative factors (Deng et al, 2017) and dynamic computer experiments (Zhang, Lin and Ranjan, 2018).…”
Section: Concluding Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In related literature pertaining to computer experiments, localized approximations of Gaussian process models are proposed, see for e.g. Gramacy and Apley (2015), Zhang et al (2016) and Park and Apley (2017). This literature is overwhelmingly frequentist, less model based and has different goals compared to the Bayesian spatial literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%