Purpose
To discern the efficacy and toxicity of SABR in the elderly population (age ≥75), and to consider how it compares to surgical outcomes historically reported in the elderly.
Methods and Materials
772 patients with clinically early-stage I-II NSCLC (T1-T3 N0M0) were treated with SABR (50 Gy in 4 fractions or 70 Gy in 10 fractions) between 2004-2014 at our center (n=442 age <75, n=330 age ≥75). Primary end points included overall survival, progression-free survival, and grade ≥3 toxicity. Median follow-up time was approximately 55 months.
Results
Compared to patients age <75, patients age ≥75 had no difference in progression free survival (p=0.419), lung cancer-specific survival (p=0.275), or toxicity (p=0.536). Overall survival was the same between both age groups at 2-years of follow-up but diverged thereafter, with patients aged <75 when treatment began having higher overall survival rates at 5 years. Median OS rates for patients age ≥75 were 86% at 1 year, 57.5% at 2 years, and 39.5% at 5 years. No patient ≥75 experienced any grade 4 or 5 toxicity.
Conclusions
SABR’s effectiveness based on lung cancer-specific survival and progression-free survival is the same in the elderly as it is the average age population. It also poses no increased toxicity. Compared to historical outcomes with surgery in the elderly, SABR outcomes here are considered comparable for stage I-II disease but have less morbidity.