2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-017-2304-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Load-estimation techniques for unsteady incompressible flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a successive work, the authors extended the use of the PIV wake rake to moving objects for the determination of the aerodynamic loads on an aircraft propeller blade (Ragni et al 2011). Recently, a detailed review of loads estimation approaches from PIV measurements has been carried out by Rival and van Oudheusden (2017) and a set of guidelines is provided for accurate fluid force measurements involving unsteady body motion by Lentink (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a successive work, the authors extended the use of the PIV wake rake to moving objects for the determination of the aerodynamic loads on an aircraft propeller blade (Ragni et al 2011). Recently, a detailed review of loads estimation approaches from PIV measurements has been carried out by Rival and van Oudheusden (2017) and a set of guidelines is provided for accurate fluid force measurements involving unsteady body motion by Lentink (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have recently gained popularity for use with planar or volume meaurements of fluid velocities (but not pressure) from particle image velocimetry and related techniques, e.g. Rival & van Oudheusden (2017) and Limacher et al (2018). For example, Limacher et al (2019a) tested an impulse equation for thrust against measurements of an impulsively started circular cylinder using PIV data, and this method was then compared by Limacher et al (2019b) to a momentum-based formulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the pressure field cannot be measured, then fluid forces and moments can be determined based on velocity and vorticity fields, which are generally determined either computationally or using particle image velocimetry (PIV) (Protas 2007;Howe 1995;Quartapelle and Napolitano 1983;Ragazzo and Tabak 2007;Magnaudet 2011;Wu 1981). Alternatively, the control volume analysis can be simplified by rewriting it into a control surface analysis (Lentink 2018;Rival and van Oudheusden 2017;Wu et al 2005). Fluid forces can then be recovered by measuring velocity, pressure and shear stress fields on the control surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluid forces can then be recovered by measuring velocity, pressure and shear stress fields on the control surface. The two main experimental implementations of this control surface analysis are highspeed particle image velocimetry (PIV) (Rival and van Oudheusden 2017), and the aerodynamic force platform (AFP) (Lentink 2018). Lentink (2018) recently derived theory to find the conditions under which the control surface formulation of the Navier-Stokes equations can be used to accurately recover fluid forces based on PIV and AFP measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%