2013
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1354961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver stiffness by shear wave elastography is influenced by meal and meal-related haemodynamic modifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to other ultrasound elastographic techniques, the examination after food intake is correlated with a false increase in LS values, as quantified by 2D-SWE [25].…”
Section: The Influence Of Food Intake On Ls Values As Measured By Swementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to other ultrasound elastographic techniques, the examination after food intake is correlated with a false increase in LS values, as quantified by 2D-SWE [25].…”
Section: The Influence Of Food Intake On Ls Values As Measured By Swementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to other ultrasound-based elastographic methods, the liver stiffness results obtained by 2D SWE.SSI may be influenced by food intake; some authors suggest that the values increase significantly in the first hour after food intake and decrease after 60 min after meal [16,17], while in other studies, these results were not reproduced [18], suggesting that maybe this method is less influenced by food intake. Nevertheless, while more studies are necessary to clarify this issue, the measurements should be performed in fasting condition to avoid any errors.…”
Section: Confounding Factorsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The 2D SWE technique is an operator-dependent method, with experience playing a role in obtaining reliable results [28]. Even though the method overcomes some of the previous limitations, it might have impaired results in patients with severe ascites, bad echoic window, obesity (BMI >30), inability to hold their breath, increased wall thickness (≥25 mm), steatosis, waist circumference (≥ 102 cm), and recent food intake [20,[52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Confounding Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%