Lithology and depositional settings of the terrigenous sediments along transform plate boundaries: Evidence from the early cretaceous Zhuravlevka terrane in Southern Sikhote Alin

Malinovsky, A. I.; Golozubov, V. V.

doi:10.1134/s1819714011050058

Cited by 11 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Zhuravlevka basin is composed mainly of turbidites with depositional ages ranging from the Berriasian to Albian (Malinovsky & Golozubov, ). But the youngest zircon in sample SAL‐48 has an age of 129 Ma and the youngest peak is ~131 Ma, constraining the depositional age in the late Early Cretaceous.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Tectonostratigraphic column of the southern Sikhote‐Alin belts, modified after Kemkin (), Kemkin and Kemkina (), Khanchuk et al (), and Malinovsky and Golozubov (). Only part of the Sergeevka nappes is shown on this figure because the stratigraphic information is incomplete.…”

Section: Geological Outline Of the Southern Sikhote‐alin Orogenic Beltmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This strike‐slip faulting system should be active after the collision of the Sergeevka nappes and the initial collage between the Zhuravlevka, Kema, and Taukha belts (Figure c) because the Central Sikhote‐Alin Fault cuts the Samarka belt, Sergeevka nappes, and most boundaries between the major belts (Figure ). It should be noted that thrusting was the initial contact relationship between most belts in Sikhote‐Alin except the Zhruavlevka turbidite basin which was deposited along the Central Sikhote‐Alin Fault at the very beginning (Khanchuk et al, ; Malinovsky & Golozubov, ).…”

Section: Tectonic Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

U‐Pb Dating and Lu‐Hf Isotopes of Detrital Zircons From the Southern Sikhote‐Alin Orogenic Belt, Russian Far East: Tectonic Implications for the Early Cretaceous Evolution of the Northwest Pacific Margin

Zhang

Wilde

et al. 2017

Tectonics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Sikhote‐Alin orogenic belt in Russian Far East is comprised of several N‐S trending belts, including the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous accretionary prisms and turbidite basin which are now separated by thrusts and strike‐slip faults. The origin and collage of the belts have been studied for decades. However, the provenance of the belts remains unclear. Six sandstone samples were collected along a 200 km long east‐west traverse across the major belts in the southern Sikhote‐Alin for U‐Pb dating and Lu‐Hf isotope analysis to constrain the provenance and evaluate the evolution of the northwest Pacific margin at this time. The result reveals that the sediments from the main Samarka belt was mainly from the adjacent Bureya‐Jiamusi‐Khanka Block (BJKB); the eastern Samarka belt and the Zhuravlevka turbidite basin were supplied by detritus from both the North China Craton (NCC) and the BJKB; the Taukha belt was mainly fed by sediments from the NCC; whereas the data from the Sergeevka nappes are insufficient to resolve their provenance. In the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous, collision and subduction was important in the initial collage of most belts in Sikhote‐Alin. However, merely E‐W trending collage cannot explain the increasing importance of the NCC provenance from west to east. It is proposed that the main Samarka belt was located adjacent to the BJKB when deposited, whereas the other belts were farther south to accept the materials from the NCC. Sinistral strike‐slip faulting transported the eastern belts northward after their initial collage by thrusting.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Geological Outline Of the Southern Sikhote‐alin Orogenic Beltmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Tectonic Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

U‐Pb Dating and Lu‐Hf Isotopes of Detrital Zircons From the Southern Sikhote‐Alin Orogenic Belt, Russian Far East: Tectonic Implications for the Early Cretaceous Evolution of the Northwest Pacific Margin

Zhang

Wilde

et al. 2017

Tectonics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This end member is characterized by paucity of lithic fragments and by greater abundance of K‐feldspar over plagioclase. They are also distinct from Early Cretaceous sandstones of adjacent sedimentary basins of the Yezo Group in Hokkaido (M. Kawamura & Fujimoto, ; Roser, Ueda, & Maehara, ) and the Zhuravlevka Terrane in Fareast Russia (A. Malinovsky & Golozoubov, , ) both of which are richer in plagioclase (Figure b).…”

Section: Modal Compositionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Material recycling in a sediment‐starved trench recorded in the Early Cretaceous Shiriya accretionary complex, Northeast Japan

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Identifying and examining geological processes that have occurred in sediment‐starved trenches of ancient non‐accretionary subduction zones exposed on land are still challenging, because such style of subduction is believed to leave scarce rock records. Our new geological mapping, petrography of coarse clastic rocks, radiolarian and zircon U–Pb dating of the Shiriya accretionary complex in Northeast Japan suggest that the younger parts (Sr1 unit) of the complex formed in a sediment‐starved trench. The key observation is that debris derived from the inner trench slope directly overlies pelagic chert in many sections where trench turbidites are lacking. A significant mass of turbidites occurring in other sections are also considered to represent distal facies of the debrites from the adjacent inner trench slope, rather than normal trench‐fill turbidites directly supplied from the continental landmass. These recycled materials from the inner trench slope comprised an imbricate frontal accretionary wedge, together with pelagic siliceous deposits of ocean floor origin. This accretionary wedge of debrite origin suggests that mass wasting on inner slopes of sediment‐starved trenches does not always result in tectonic erosion (removal of materials from the upper plate), but results in material recycling to reconstruct a new frontal accretionary wedge. The spatial dimensions of the recycling cell may be one of the critical differences between accretionary and non‐accretionary margins. Recycled continental materials transported by turbidites from remote landmasses construct frontal wedges in accretionary margins, whereas mass wasting on adjacent slopes and re‐accretion at the trench recycle continental materials in non‐accretionary margins. The transition from an accretionary to non‐accretionary (i.e. sediment‐starved) trench detected in the Shiriya Complex potentially records tectonic response of the inner trench slope to increased friction along the subduction interface.

show abstract

“…1b), whose formation was closely related to the paleo-Pacific plate subduction (Malinovsky and Golozubov, 2011). The SAOB lies to the east of the late-Precambrian massifs -Bureya, Jiamusi and Khanka (Fig.…”

Section: Geological Background and Sample Descriptionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geochronology and geochemistry of Late Cretaceous–Paleocene granitoids in the Sikhote-Alin Orogenic Belt: Petrogenesis and implications for the oblique subduction of the paleo-Pacific plate

Tang

Niu

et al. 2016

Lithos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

) 'Geochronology and geochemistry of Late CretaceousPaleocene granitoids in the Sikhote-Alin Orogenic Belt : petrogenesis and implications for the oblique subduction of the paleo-Pacic plate. ', Lithos.,[266][267] Further information on publisher's website: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. A C C E P T E D M A N U S C R I P T ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

show abstract

Lithology and depositional settings of the terrigenous sediments along transform plate boundaries: Evidence from the early cretaceous Zhuravlevka terrane in Southern Sikhote Alin

Cited by 11 publications

References 8 publications

U‐Pb Dating and Lu‐Hf Isotopes of Detrital Zircons From the Southern Sikhote‐Alin Orogenic Belt, Russian Far East: Tectonic Implications for the Early Cretaceous Evolution of the Northwest Pacific Margin

U‐Pb Dating and Lu‐Hf Isotopes of Detrital Zircons From the Southern Sikhote‐Alin Orogenic Belt, Russian Far East: Tectonic Implications for the Early Cretaceous Evolution of the Northwest Pacific Margin

Material recycling in a sediment‐starved trench recorded in the Early Cretaceous Shiriya accretionary complex, Northeast Japan

Geochronology and geochemistry of Late Cretaceous–Paleocene granitoids in the Sikhote-Alin Orogenic Belt: Petrogenesis and implications for the oblique subduction of the paleo-Pacific plate

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About