Liquidity creation and bank performance: evidence from MENA

Abstract

Purpose Islamic banks have significantly different balance sheets from their conventional counterparts, leading to different implications in relation to liquidity creation compared to conventional banks. This work, first, investigates the liquidity creation of conventional and Islamic banks in Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) countries between 2011 and 2016. It then tests the relationship between liquidity creation and performance of these banks. Design/methodology/approach It uses the data of 491 commercial banks across 18 MENA countries between 2011 and 2016. The analysis is based on panel data techniques. Findings The banks created US$18.596 trillion of liquidity, about 28.4% of total assets. Conventional banks created more liquidity compared with Islamic banks. Nevertheless, Islamic banks created more liquidity per asset compared with conventional banks. The regression analysis revealed a significant and negative correlation between liquidity creation and performance of the banks using return on average equity (ROAE) measure. However, no significant relationship is observed between liquidity creation and return on average assets (ROAA) of MENA banks. Moreover, there is no difference between Islamic and conventional banks in the relation between liquidity creation and bank performance. Research limitations/implications The data are limited to the period 2011-2016; the period of this study was selected based on yearly data availability from the data source. Accounting measures were used to study the effect of liquidity creation on bank profitability, and the market-based measures were excluded, as there is no uniform sources in these countries that can be used to collect market-based data. Practical implications Bank managers must reach a trade-off between the advantages and disadvantages of liquidity creation, as well as consider the negative relationship between liquidity creation and bank performance when making their decisions. Originality/value First, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this work is the first to analyse the relationship between the liquidity creation and performance of conventional and Islamic banks in MENA. Second, this study uses a sample of Islamic and conventional banks in MENA that have detailed information on the Orbis Bank Focus dataset, which is the most comprehensive database of commercial banks in the MENA region.

Does Islamic Banking Promote Financial Stability? Evidence From an Agent-Based Model

“…Despite having low net worth/assets ratios, Banks 12 and 14 generate more liquidity per asset compared to conventional banks and operate more effectively. This finding is in line with the literature, which has found that Islamic banks create more liquidity per asset compared to conventional ones (Berger & Bouwman, 2009;Berger, Allen, Boubakri, Guedhami, & Li, 2019;Sahyouni & Wang, 2019). Banks 12 and 14 also have the largest total assets among the Islamic banks, supporting the view that the stabilising role of Islamic banks strengthens when they become larger (Ibrahim & Rizvi, 2017).…”

Efficiency, Risk and Profitability of Islamic Banks: Under Pressure in the Competition of the Banking Industry in Indonesia

“…where NPF has no effect on profitability [17]. The results of this study are in line with the findings of previous studies, where liquidity does not affect profitability [3], [18], [16], [19]. Bank liquidity does not affect profitability.…”

The Impact of Risk Management Factors on Banks Performance of Pakistan

“…Risk identification is the process of initiating actions; creating awareness, common sense, and commitment; and clarification of expectations. Board risk management committee if not carried out correctly will lead to future defaults (Sahyouni and Wang 2019).…”