2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12257-013-0495-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lipase immobilization on magnetic microspheres via spacer arms: Effect of steric hindrance on the activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect could be due to enzyme overcrowding on the particle surface, which can result in lower enzymatic activity due to steric hindrance. 50,51 Although (to the best of our knowledge) this behavior has not been observed for urease micromotors before, Yang et al do observe a similar trend for their MOFtors, where an increase in catalase loading resulted in less generation of the O 2 product. 4 Thus, the optimal concentration of immobilized urease for self-propulsion of Urhex motors is ∼60 mg/mL.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This effect could be due to enzyme overcrowding on the particle surface, which can result in lower enzymatic activity due to steric hindrance. 50,51 Although (to the best of our knowledge) this behavior has not been observed for urease micromotors before, Yang et al do observe a similar trend for their MOFtors, where an increase in catalase loading resulted in less generation of the O 2 product. 4 Thus, the optimal concentration of immobilized urease for self-propulsion of Urhex motors is ∼60 mg/mL.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This might be ascribed to the following reasons: The conformation of the enzyme molecule immobilized on the porous microspheres was somewhat changed compared to the free enzyme (Mannen et al, 2001;Liu et al, 2013;Secundo, 2013). In addition, the immobilization led to an increase in the steric hindrance between the enzyme and the substrate (Ying et al, 2002;Zhang et al, 2012;Rodrigues et al, 2013;Jahangiri et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2014) which caused a decrease in the activity of the immobilized enzyme. However, the unique structure of the porous microspheres could impart a good microenvironment to the immobilized enzyme molecules, reduce the influence of external adverse factors on the enzyme molecules, and thereby improve the thermal stability (Han et al, 2015;Han et al, 2016).…”
Section: Immobilization Of Rate-limited Enzyme (Ips) Of the Pathway Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was speculated that 3-chloropropyltriethoxysilane (CPS), as a spacer, could reduce steric hindrance, so that more enzymes could bind to the surface of the supporting materials. 36 Secondly, the covalent attachment also played an important role in the performance. Thirdly, magnetic mesoporous silicon was deposited on the surface of graphene oxide, which provided more surface area and more chemical functional groups that could absorb PPL.…”
Section: Ppl Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Compared to nonimmobilized PPL, immobilized PPL has advantages in terms of stability at different pH values, which was similar to previous reports. [35][36][37] Fig. 7 TGA curves of GO and CPS/GO-Fe 3 O 4 @MCM-41.…”
Section: Ppl Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%