1999
DOI: 10.2138/am-1999-5-627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking structure and chemistry in the schorl-dravite series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
59
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Measured data were evaluated with the DIFFRAC plus EVA software package. Analyzed scans were fitted by, and lattice parameters refined with, the DIFFRAC plus TOPAS software on a basis of dravite structure (sample 32008, Bloodaxe et al 1999). Average bond lengths in octahedra were calculated from lattice parameters according to empirical formulae: a = 13.045 + 1.437 <Y-O> Å; c = 0.886 + 3.272 <Z-O> Å (Bosi and Lucchesi 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Measured data were evaluated with the DIFFRAC plus EVA software package. Analyzed scans were fitted by, and lattice parameters refined with, the DIFFRAC plus TOPAS software on a basis of dravite structure (sample 32008, Bloodaxe et al 1999). Average bond lengths in octahedra were calculated from lattice parameters according to empirical formulae: a = 13.045 + 1.437 <Y-O> Å; c = 0.886 + 3.272 <Z-O> Å (Bosi and Lucchesi 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The <Z-O> bond length in octahedra entirely occupied by Al, as in elbaite, rossmanite, olenite and foitite, varies between 1.90 and 1.91 Å (e.g., Grice and Ercit 1993;MacDonald et al 1993;Burns et al 1994;Selway et al 1998, Cempírek et al 2006. In contrast, the <Z-O> bond length in Mg-bearing tourmalines is in the range of 1.92 to 1.93 Å (e.g., Bloodaxe et al 1999;Hawthorne et al 1999;Bosi and Lucchesi 2004;Ertl et al 2010;Bačík et al 2011a, in print). There is a good correlation between Z Mg content and the <Z-O> bond length (Ertl et al 2010): the <Z-O> bond length increases with the Z Mg (or other cations with ionic radius larger than Al, if present).…”
Section: Crystal Chemistry Of Tourmalinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is difficult to analyze samples for boron by electron microprobe, and difficult to detect small amounts of substituent B in X-ray structure studies. Although the presence of tetrahedrally coordinated B has been demonstrated in tourmaline using magic-angle-spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (MAS NMR) (Tagg et al 1999) and substantial [4] B substitution for Si has been reported in synthetic olenite (Wodara & Schreyer 1997, 1998, Schreyer et al 2000, no structural study has unequivocally shown B to occur in amounts greater than 3 apfu (atoms per formula unit) in tourmaline (e.g., Burns et al 1994, Hawthorne 1996, Bloodaxe et al 1999, with a single exception. Ertl et al (1997) reported the presence in a sample of olenite of significant excess B by electron-microprobe analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bond valence sum increases monotonously from 2.5 vu in Al-poor tourmalines to 2.8 vu in elbaite and olenite samples. In Al-poor tourmalines, there is usually a proportion of Mg at the Z site present due to Al-Mg disorder (Grice and Ercit 1993;Hawthorne et al 1993;Bloodaxe et al 1999;Marschall et al 2004;Ertl et al 2010). Such a bond-valence sum brings relatively clear evidence of this disorder, although the sum would get higher, if disorder is considered and Mg-O values would be used.…”
Section: Bond Valence Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%