2021
DOI: 10.7554/elife.73819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linking spatial self-organization to community assembly and biodiversity

Abstract: Temporal shifts to drier climates impose environmental stresses on plant communities that may result in community reassembly and threatened ecosystem services, but also may trigger self-organization in spatial patterns of biota and resources, which act to relax these stresses. The complex relationships between these counteracting processes - community reassembly and spatial self-organization - have hardly been studied. Using a spatio-temporal model of dryland plant communities and a trait-based approach, we st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in line with previous empirical studies from patterned ecosystems where the success of introduced patches depended on patch size (Angelini et al, 2016), or the recovery of patch disturbances depended on the habitat suitability for the community forming the disturbed patch (Van Belzen et al, 2017). For instance, while the implications for pattern formation through resource concentration mechanisms have been prominently studied for the restoration of dryland ecosystems (Bera et al, 2021), the restoration perspective taken here highlights the effect of patch size and density on the trajectory toward landscape recovery (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in line with previous empirical studies from patterned ecosystems where the success of introduced patches depended on patch size (Angelini et al, 2016), or the recovery of patch disturbances depended on the habitat suitability for the community forming the disturbed patch (Van Belzen et al, 2017). For instance, while the implications for pattern formation through resource concentration mechanisms have been prominently studied for the restoration of dryland ecosystems (Bera et al, 2021), the restoration perspective taken here highlights the effect of patch size and density on the trajectory toward landscape recovery (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By means of Turing reaction-diffusion morphogenesis equations (Cuddington et al, 2007), modelling self-organisation processes can highlight the role of EEs in the assembly, dynamic, diversity and stability of ecosystems and EF (Bera et al, 2021). The formation of spatial patterns such as bare soil, spot, rings, strips or uniform vegetation results from a combination of positive and negative feedback between EEs and resources at individual and landscape scales (Gilad et al, 2007).…”
Section: Mechanistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-organization of vegetation patchiness caused by aridity can reduce ecosystem plant biomass (Box 2), and increase water fluxes and nutrient cycling in vegetation patches 132 . For shallow-rooted plant species adapted to mesic conditions, selforganization of vegetation patchiness amplifies degradative climate change effects, while transition to deep-rooted, drought-adapted species buffers against such effects (Box 2) 133 .…”
Section: Self-organization Of Vegetation Patchinessmentioning
confidence: 99%