1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.51.1456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear system-size scaling methods for electronic-structure calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
229
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
229
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The method is validated below for DFT liquid water, including the localization approximations required for linear scaling. [19][20][21] After the characterization of the equilibrium properties, we present results on nonequilibrium relaxation processes, which provide insights into why the simulations need longer times, how to look at the DFT deficiencies, and, more importantly, into the nature of liquid water itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is validated below for DFT liquid water, including the localization approximations required for linear scaling. [19][20][21] After the characterization of the equilibrium properties, we present results on nonequilibrium relaxation processes, which provide insights into why the simulations need longer times, how to look at the DFT deficiencies, and, more importantly, into the nature of liquid water itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) exhibits extremely slow convergence 3,21,24,26,32 rendering such an approach impractical ( Figure 1). …”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second step is extracting dynamic properties such as linear and nonlinear-response functions from this Hamiltonian. While the first step has been extensively studied [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and also comprehensive reviews are available [9,10], the second step has been studied by only few papers [11][12][13][14][15], including the particle source method [16,17] and the projection method [18][19][20][21], which use the numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation [22], and projected random vectors [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%