2023
DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v13i1.pp770-780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear regression models with autoregressive integrated moving average errors for measurements from real time kinematics-global navigation satellite system during dynamic test

Abstract: <span lang="EN-US">The autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) method has been used to model global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) measurement errors. Most ARIMA error models describe time series data of static GNSS receivers. Its application for modeling of GNSS under dynamic tests is not evident. In this paper, we aim to describe real time kinematic-GNSS (RTK-GNSS) errors during dynamic tests using linear regression with ARIMA errors to establish a proof of concept via simulation that mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where, 𝛼 0 is a concentration parameter, the value of mixing coefficient is near to zero and Γ(x) is a Gamma function. The mean and covariance matrix are sampled through the (13), 𝑃(𝜇 𝑗 |𝛾 𝑗 ) = 𝑁 (𝜇 𝑗 |𝛽 0 (𝜂 0 𝛾 𝑗 ) −1 ) 𝑊(𝛾 𝑗 |𝑣 0 , 𝜎 0 ), Hence, the processes involved in Bayesian GMM generation for every observation are presented in ( 14), ( 15), ( 16) and (17),…”
Section: Ifree-based Protection Level Estimation Using Gmm Overboundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where, 𝛼 0 is a concentration parameter, the value of mixing coefficient is near to zero and Γ(x) is a Gamma function. The mean and covariance matrix are sampled through the (13), 𝑃(𝜇 𝑗 |𝛾 𝑗 ) = 𝑁 (𝜇 𝑗 |𝛽 0 (𝜂 0 𝛾 𝑗 ) −1 ) 𝑊(𝛾 𝑗 |𝑣 0 , 𝜎 0 ), Hence, the processes involved in Bayesian GMM generation for every observation are presented in ( 14), ( 15), ( 16) and (17),…”
Section: Ifree-based Protection Level Estimation Using Gmm Overboundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent years, it is seen that over-bounding relies on localization for defining its location and pose which subsequently aids the path planning and navigation processes [16]. The localization techniques such as cooperative positioning, field measure from sensors and range-based techniques are developed to attain high-level positioning accuracy [17]. However, the sensors deployed in this localization system generate measurement errors like single-point solution in GPS and offset drifts in the inertia sensors [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 1 to 4 indicates the methods of modeling the fully independent conditional (FIC) sparse GPR as explained in [28] whereas step 5 to 8 depicts the LR-ARIMA modelling adopted from [30]. In step 1 to 4, FIC sparse GPR model is trained using the rover trajectory data to predict improved trajectory x-y coordinate points.…”
Section: Gpr-lr-arima Model Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this work is to improve model fitting and positioning accuracy of dynamic trajectory data described by the sparse GPR models [28]. We proposed an integrated model approach using both sparse GPR and Linear regression with autoregressive moving average errors (LR-ARIMA) models that were developed by Nahar et al [28] and Ng et al [30] respectively to describe dynamic trajectory data. ARIMA error models could further describe the un-modelled errors in the residuals of the GPR with better correlation in the model based on time series method [30]- [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation