1958
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1958-0135681-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear automaton transformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
161
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 387 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
161
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The superpolynomial blowup occurs when constructing a DFA from the NFA recognizing the right-hand expression. A lower bound to this blowup is given by the MyhillNerode theorem [11,7]. All the other steps, seen separately, are polynomial-time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superpolynomial blowup occurs when constructing a DFA from the NFA recognizing the right-hand expression. A lower bound to this blowup is given by the MyhillNerode theorem [11,7]. All the other steps, seen separately, are polynomial-time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, that is the equivalence relation ∼ coincides with Myhill-Nerode equivalence [11] over the states of the automaton A T E , that can be computed in O(| E |) time and space complexity using Revuz Algorithm [13]. Proof.…”
Section: If E = F Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first attempt to minimize lattice automata would be to follow the classical paradigm for minimizing DFA using the Myhill Nerode theorem [20,21]. In fact, for the case of simple LDFA, the plan proceeds smoothly (see [17,22], where the problem is discussed by means of fuzzy automata) 3 …”
Section: Minimizing Ldfasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the minimization problem for deterministic automata is of great interest, both theoretically and in practice. For traditional automata on finite words, a minimization algorithm, based on the Myhill-Nerode right congruence on the set of words, generates in polynomial time a canonical minimal deterministic automaton [20,21]. In more detail, given a regular language L over Σ, then the relation y · z ∈ L, is an equivalence relation, its equivalence classes correspond to the states of a minimal automaton for A, and they also uniquely induce the transitions of such an automaton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%