2008
DOI: 10.2319/122106-52.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: While many linear measurements between cephalometric landmarks on 3D volumetric surface renderings obtained using Dolphin 3D software generated from CBCT datasets may be statistically significantly different from anatomic dimensions, most can be considered to be sufficiently clinically accurate for craniofacial analyses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
206
2
34

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
206
2
34
Order By: Relevance
“…The effective dose (ICRP 2007) from a standard dental protocol scan using traditional CT is 1.5 to 12.3 times greater than that for comparable medium-FOV dental CBCT scans. CBCT image quality has also been found to be equivalent to that of traditional CT for visualization of maxillofacial structures (24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The effective dose (ICRP 2007) from a standard dental protocol scan using traditional CT is 1.5 to 12.3 times greater than that for comparable medium-FOV dental CBCT scans. CBCT image quality has also been found to be equivalent to that of traditional CT for visualization of maxillofacial structures (24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several studies have been carried out to determine the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT). [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] However, these studies have utilized dry skulls without the soft tissue component. These studies have shown linear measurement to be accurate on CBCT images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voxel size, type of image detector, scanning time, reconstruction time, radiation dose, and head position have been mentioned as variables that could affect CBCT linear measurements. 9,15 Two previous studies have investigated the effect of head position on linear measurements and found it insignificant. 16,17 Another study compared measurement accuracy using two different voxel settings with no difference in accuracy between the two groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%