2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42683-5_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits of Distributed Dislocations in Geometric and Constitutive Paradigms

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the transport equation for kforms requires more regularity on ω. For instance, one can model continuously-distributed dislocation via the so-called Weitzenböck approach (see, e.g., [23] for an overview) and consider the torsion 2-form of a material connection expressing a distribution of dislocations. However, this only makes sense in the smooth setting, and for singular torsions, most notably the torsion concentrated on discrete dislocation lines, one needs to adopt a dual approach, as detailed in the appendix to [26], leading eventually to the transport of singular 1-currents.…”
Section: -Currents: Assume That We Have a Family Of Normal 1-currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the transport equation for kforms requires more regularity on ω. For instance, one can model continuously-distributed dislocation via the so-called Weitzenböck approach (see, e.g., [23] for an overview) and consider the torsion 2-form of a material connection expressing a distribution of dislocations. However, this only makes sense in the smooth setting, and for singular torsions, most notably the torsion concentrated on discrete dislocation lines, one needs to adopt a dual approach, as detailed in the appendix to [26], leading eventually to the transport of singular 1-currents.…”
Section: -Currents: Assume That We Have a Family Of Normal 1-currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denoting the total deformation of our specimen as y : Ω ⊂ R 3 → R 3 , for which det ∇y > 0, the commonly used multiplicative Kröner decomposition ∇y = EP splits the deformation gradient into elastic and plastic distortions E, P. Since E, P are not in general deformation gradients themselves, they are henceforth referred to as "distortions". We refer to [20,35,43,45,59,63,68,69,92,93] for justifications and various other aspects of this decomposition. Our description of the crystal in Section 2.3 will in fact give its own justification of the Kröner decomposition based on the crystal scaffold, which is the variable we use to describe the state of the crystal around a point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, one could have employed the so-called "geometrical language of continuum mechanics" [22,34,35] to obtain an additional level of consistency (and, perhaps, elegance), but this brings with it further notational complications. We have therefore opted not to pursue this avenue here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is modelled as a macroscopic continuum with total deformation y : [0, T ] × Ω → R 3 , for which we require the orientation-preserving condition det ∇y(t) > 0 pointwise in Ω (almost everywhere) for any time t ∈ [0, T ]. We work in the large-strain, geometrically nonlinear regime, where the deformation gradient splits according to the Kröner decomposition [15,26,31,32,37,38,40,41,57,58] ∇y = EP into an elastic distortion E : [0, T ] × Ω → R 3×3 and a plastic distortion P : [0, T ] × Ω → R 3×3 (with det E, det P > 0 pointwise a.e. in Ω).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%