2009
DOI: 10.1116/1.3253603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limiting factors in sub-10nm scanning-electron-beam lithography

Abstract: Achieving the highest possible resolution using scanning-electron-beam lithography ͑SEBL͒ has become an increasingly urgent problem in recent years, as advances in various nanotechnology applications ͓F. feature sizes well into the sub-10 nm domain, close to the resolution limit of the current generation of SEBL processes. In this work, the authors have used a combination of calculation, modeling, and experiment to investigate the relative effects of resist contrast, beam scattering, secondary electron generat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the use of HSQ with high contrast development aided in achieving higher resolution. The minimum half-pitch observed (9 nm) coincided with the electron beam spot size (9 nm), which was measured previously in [4].…”
Section: Resolution Limit and Dose Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the use of HSQ with high contrast development aided in achieving higher resolution. The minimum half-pitch observed (9 nm) coincided with the electron beam spot size (9 nm), which was measured previously in [4].…”
Section: Resolution Limit and Dose Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron-beam lithography (EBL) at energies 30 keV and above is a well established method of fabricating sub-20-nm-pitch structures [1,2,3,4]. However, EBL at these high energies suffers from long-range proximity effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impressive high-resolution patterning of sub-20-nm pitch structures have been demonstrated using these methods. 6,10 As the resolution of HSQ-based EBL is currently thought to be limited in part by the resist performance, 11 better understanding of HSQ should enable further improvements in the resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at such small length scales, metrology becomes challenging. 15,16 For example, considering a criticaldimension control standard deviation of 10% for sub-5 nm half-pitch features implies a metrology accuracy of ϳ0.1 nm, which poses a challenge to even the best scanning electron microscopes ͑SEMs͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%