2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-018-2058-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited resource semiquantum secret sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An SQSS protocol without the need for measurement was proposed in [97]. A d-dimensional protocol was proposed in [98] which also did not require classical users to measure and supported multiple (beyond two) classical users.…”
Section: Secret Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An SQSS protocol without the need for measurement was proposed in [97]. A d-dimensional protocol was proposed in [98] which also did not require classical users to measure and supported multiple (beyond two) classical users.…”
Section: Secret Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [24] projected Semi quantum procedure to enhance security. The idea of Semi Quantum method is the qubit sender wants to make covert communication to the specific clients with restricted quantum ability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CloQ protocols involve at least one classical party (or CloQ party) who is restricted to using the four classical operations 1-4 described below for interacting with a quantum channel. CloQ protocols have been shown to exhibit highly interesting theoretical properties; currently, their most well understood application is SQKD (see [18] for a recent review), but CloQ protocols have also been devised to solve other cryptographic problems, including secret sharing [19], [20], [21], secure direct communication [22], [23], [24], [25], identity verification [26], [27], and private state comparison [28]. CloQ protocols may even be devised in the future for quantum verification by defining a CloQ variant of QPIP (quantum prover interactive proofs) [29], which could allow a CloQ party to verify quantum computations performed by a fully quantum center (or prover).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%