2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of measuring small magnetic signals of samples deposited on a diamagnetic substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although resembling a ferromagnetic response, such a shape is caused by the presence of the trapped flux H tr in the superconducting magnet. Other evidence for the dependence of this type of residual hysteresis in net-diamagnetic samples on the history of the magnet has been provided before [27]. Here it will be demonstrated that identical residual hysteresis with opposite chirality can be recorded when paramagnetic samples are used.…”
Section: Superconducting Coilmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although resembling a ferromagnetic response, such a shape is caused by the presence of the trapped flux H tr in the superconducting magnet. Other evidence for the dependence of this type of residual hysteresis in net-diamagnetic samples on the history of the magnet has been provided before [27]. Here it will be demonstrated that identical residual hysteresis with opposite chirality can be recorded when paramagnetic samples are used.…”
Section: Superconducting Coilmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…As the example of such an effect we discuss a room temperature hysteresis loop m(H J ) collected for a sapphire substrate. It is important to note that there may exist a 'genuine' FM component in sapphire [14] and in particular in a non-properly handled sapphire [27]. We discuss this issue further in this review (chapter III).…”
Section: Superconducting Coilmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The diamagnetic contribution of the sapphire substrate has been derived from the M(H) curve recorded at 300 K and subtracted from all data and great care has been taken to avoid the various measurement artifacts for these kind of samples. 20,21 M(T) curves were measured in a field of 10 mT while warming from 2 K to 300 K after the sample was either cooled down from 300 K to 2 K in 5 T (field heated (FH)) or in zero-field cooling (ZFC). For better comparability of the data, the magnetization data were normalized with respect to the sample area which neglects variations of the film thickness of the order of 10%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hysteresis loops of the FePt films grown on MgO ( Fig.4(a)) and on STO (Fig.4(b)) show easy magnetization c-axis oriented perpendicular to the film plane. In the latter, an artifact of the SQUID measurement is present close to the zero applied field, which is due to change in sensitivity scale and/or sample contaminations [8]. Relevant magnetic properties of thin films are reported in table 1.…”
Section: Sto At 450mentioning
confidence: 99%