2016
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2016.2536018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lightning: A High-Efficient Neighbor Discovery Protocol for Low Duty Cycle WSNs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many asynchronous neighbor discovery algorithms have emerged in recent years. Based on whether the discovery latency is finite or not, existing pairwise asynchronous protocols are divided into the probabilistic algorithms [12,19,20] and deterministic ones [8,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many asynchronous neighbor discovery algorithms have emerged in recent years. Based on whether the discovery latency is finite or not, existing pairwise asynchronous protocols are divided into the probabilistic algorithms [12,19,20] and deterministic ones [8,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The later researchers find that employing unequal-sized slots can obtain good discovery performance. Searchlight-Striped [7], Non-integer [25] and Lightning [26] are included. There are other related methods, i.e., block-based methods [8,27] and Nihao [28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in recent years, we find a few of neighbor discovery algorithms that are based on directional antennas. The existing works can broadly be categorized in two types: one-way broadcasting mechanisms [22][23][24][25][26][27] and two-or three-way handshaking mechanisms [11,13,14,[28][29][30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The node that receives a HELLO message checks its neighbor table to find whether the node is discovered earlier or not. If there exists a record, the node checks the flag value and if the value is 1, it does not give any REPLY message to that node assuming that it has exchanged messages in the earlier slots with that node; otherwise, it updates the information in the neighbor table and sends a REPLY message in a random sub-slot to the direction of the sender node (lines [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. If the sender node receives a REPLY message (without any collision) from any neighbor, it adds the node in the neighbor table (lines [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Indirect Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%