2004
DOI: 10.1364/jon.3.000261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-trails: an optical solution for IP transport [Invited]

Abstract: We present a solution for IP-centric communication at the optical layer through a combination of a hardware platform and algorithmic implementation. The presented approach, termed light-trails, is shown to yield a reconfigurable networking platform in which optical connections of arbitrary duration can be established and torn down flexibly in negligible time, accommodating the dynamic traffic requirements of the IP world. The hardware platform and protocol are evaluated with tractable mathematical models valid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Light-trail and connection provisioning have been theoretically studied in [6]. In [1], is proposed a Just-Enough-Time [19] based control mechanism that allows nodes to use light-trail bandwidth based on their position with respect to the convener of the light-trail. This approach gave a higher probability of success to nodes that were closer to the convener than to nodes closer to the end-node, leading to issues of fairness and hence inability to provision services [1].…”
Section: Light-trail Node Architecture and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Light-trail and connection provisioning have been theoretically studied in [6]. In [1], is proposed a Just-Enough-Time [19] based control mechanism that allows nodes to use light-trail bandwidth based on their position with respect to the convener of the light-trail. This approach gave a higher probability of success to nodes that were closer to the convener than to nodes closer to the end-node, leading to issues of fairness and hence inability to provision services [1].…”
Section: Light-trail Node Architecture and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1], is proposed a Just-Enough-Time [19] based control mechanism that allows nodes to use light-trail bandwidth based on their position with respect to the convener of the light-trail. This approach gave a higher probability of success to nodes that were closer to the convener than to nodes closer to the end-node, leading to issues of fairness and hence inability to provision services [1]. Solution to some of the fairness and dynamic bandwidth allocation problems were solved in [4] by proposing a 'dual auction' mechanism for bandwidth allocation in light-trails.…”
Section: Light-trail Node Architecture and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fundamentally, there are two differences between the SLiT concept and the original light-trail proposed in [1][2][3]. Architecturally, the node is modified to support a higher (twice) number of connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLiT solves the utilization issue by ensuring that the fiber is uniformly used. To do so, SLiT makes use of bidirectional EDFAs [4] as the only system enhancing feature as compared to the original light-trail drafts of [1][2][3]. At an acceptable delay penalty (consistent with that provided by light-trails) a SLiT is able to provide the necessary communication framework for emerging dynamic applications in both simplex as well as duplex communication modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%