2019
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201901167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light Lanthanide Metallocenium Cations Exhibiting Weak Equatorial Anion Interactions

Abstract: As the dysprosocenium complex [Dy(Cp ttt ) 2 ][B(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] (Cp ttt =C 5 H 2 t Bu 3 ‐1,2,4, 1‐Dy ) exhibits magnetic hysteresis at 60 K, similar lanthanide (Ln) complexes have been targeted to provide insights into this remarkable property. We recently reported homolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unique coordination environment provided by rigid η 5 -cyclopentadienyl ligands has led to remarkable magnetic properties in lanthanide complexes; , this can be attributed to the constrained number of metal–ligand vibrational modes that limit the possible pathways for fast, through-barrier magnetic relaxation. , Through-barrier processes, such as quantum tunneling and Raman relaxation, tend to dominate magnetic relaxation in actinide-based systems, although it was recently predicted that the cation [Cp ttt 2 U] + should be capable of relaxing via an Orbach (overbarrier) process . Furthermore, the increased spin–orbit coupling of the 5f orbitals imparts the actinides with greater magnetic anisotropy than the lanthanides, which can, in principle, lead to larger barriers to magnetic relaxation. , However, the Cp iPr5 analogue of the uranium metallocenium cation, [(Cp iPr5 ) 2 U]­[B­(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ], and its iodide adduct, (Cp iPr5 ) 2 UI, were recently shown to exhibit relatively fast, field-induced slow magnetic relaxation via a Raman process .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The unique coordination environment provided by rigid η 5 -cyclopentadienyl ligands has led to remarkable magnetic properties in lanthanide complexes; , this can be attributed to the constrained number of metal–ligand vibrational modes that limit the possible pathways for fast, through-barrier magnetic relaxation. , Through-barrier processes, such as quantum tunneling and Raman relaxation, tend to dominate magnetic relaxation in actinide-based systems, although it was recently predicted that the cation [Cp ttt 2 U] + should be capable of relaxing via an Orbach (overbarrier) process . Furthermore, the increased spin–orbit coupling of the 5f orbitals imparts the actinides with greater magnetic anisotropy than the lanthanides, which can, in principle, lead to larger barriers to magnetic relaxation. , However, the Cp iPr5 analogue of the uranium metallocenium cation, [(Cp iPr5 ) 2 U]­[B­(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ], and its iodide adduct, (Cp iPr5 ) 2 UI, were recently shown to exhibit relatively fast, field-induced slow magnetic relaxation via a Raman process .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The global yield of 1 is 26% over three reaction steps based on DyI 3 . The triethylammonium reagent was selected as it provides an entropic driving force with dual amine and alkene elimination during the reaction, and the [Al­{OC­(CF 3 ) 3 } 4 ] − anion is more weakly coordinating than the [B­(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] − anion, which has been used for the synthesis of all Ln metallocenium cations to date. ,, The direct reaction of [Dy­(Dtp) 2 (I)] with [H­(SiEt 3 ) 2 ]­[B­(C 6 F 5 ) 4 ] gave an intractable mixture of products. 1 H, 13 C, and 31 P NMR spectra of a sample of 1 in d 5 -chlorobenzene were uninformative due to paramagnetism, but the [Al­{OC­(CF 3 ) 3 } 4 ] − anion was detected by 19 F NMR spectroscopy (δ F : −90.50 ppm; v 1/2 = 300 Hz); the presence of paramagnetic [Dy­(Dtp) 2 ] + cations has broadened this signal and shifted it considerably from the [NEt 3 H]­[Al­{OC­(CF 3 ) 3 } 4 ] precursor (δ F : −75.70 ppm, d 2 -DCM).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the ligand field splitting is comparable to the splitting between spin–orbit multiplets, J is no longer a good quantum number, and the coupling scheme breaks down, for example, for Sm­(III), leading to the phenomenon of “ J mixing”, commonly invoked to explain unusual oscillator strengths and odd transitions in polarized emission spectra. Despite this, many other spectral phenomena defy explanation, and “ J mixing” is often cited as a “catch-all”, highlighting limitations in current understanding. ,, …”
Section: Electronic Structure Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%