1988
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(88)80443-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-induced excited spin state trapping (LIESST) in [Fe(2-mephen)3]2+ embedded in polymer matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the system of non-interacting complexes, an inhomogeneous distribution results in deviation from single exponential with a characteristic fast initial decay and a long tail with a much slower decay. This behaviour is, in fact, observable for iron(II) spin-crossover complexes embedded in polymer matrices [30]. For the concentrated system, the effect of an inhomogeneous distribution is to reduce the self-acceleration quite dramatically.…”
Section: Inhomogeneous Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For the system of non-interacting complexes, an inhomogeneous distribution results in deviation from single exponential with a characteristic fast initial decay and a long tail with a much slower decay. This behaviour is, in fact, observable for iron(II) spin-crossover complexes embedded in polymer matrices [30]. For the concentrated system, the effect of an inhomogeneous distribution is to reduce the self-acceleration quite dramatically.…”
Section: Inhomogeneous Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the absence of cooperative effects this results in gradual spin transitions with a well defined transition temperature, single exponential decay curves rather than the self-accelerated curves often observed for neat crystalline materials [11] and no interference from crystallographic phase transitions [35] nor deviations from single exponential decay due to inhomogeneous distributions in amorphous matrices [36].…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, which is several orders of magnitude larger than that for iron(II) SCO compounds, because Dr HL is smaller for the ironA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (III) compounds. [57] In 1, the k HL A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (T!0) value, 2.4 10 À8 s…”
Section: ]Ncs (4) and [Fea C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (Qsal)mentioning
confidence: 99%