2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, the values of the maximum interstory drifts and floor accelerations need to be calculated for three hazard levels (2/50, 10/50, and 50/50). The structural performance of each optimized design and for each hazard level is obtained by means of multi-stripe incremental dynamic analysis (Mitropoulou Ch et al, 2011) using scaled natural records for each hazard level (see Tables 2-4); relying on S A (T 1 , 5%) of the Eurocode 8 response spectrum for each hazard level, respectively. The relative scale of records' two components is preserved implementing the following procedure, the record's component with the highest S A (T 1 , 5%) is scaled first, and the same scaling factor is assigned to the second component in order to preserve their relative ratio.…”
Section: Life-cycle Cost Assessment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this purpose, the values of the maximum interstory drifts and floor accelerations need to be calculated for three hazard levels (2/50, 10/50, and 50/50). The structural performance of each optimized design and for each hazard level is obtained by means of multi-stripe incremental dynamic analysis (Mitropoulou Ch et al, 2011) using scaled natural records for each hazard level (see Tables 2-4); relying on S A (T 1 , 5%) of the Eurocode 8 response spectrum for each hazard level, respectively. The relative scale of records' two components is preserved implementing the following procedure, the record's component with the highest S A (T 1 , 5%) is scaled first, and the same scaling factor is assigned to the second component in order to preserve their relative ratio.…”
Section: Life-cycle Cost Assessment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, LCCA is used for assessing the optimized performancebased designs based on the total cost which accounts for the initial and the life-cycle cost of the structures. LCCA refers to the possible damages caused by earthquake events that might occur during the life span of the structure (Mitropoulou Ch et al, 2011). Therefore, non-linear dynamic analyses are performed for computing the structural response in strong seismic events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluar el costo total esperado durante la vida útil de las estructuras es actualmente un gran reto para los ingenieros civiles debido a que las estructuras son diseñadas para que tengan una vida útil relativamente amplia, aproximadamente entre 50 y 75 años (American Society of Civil Engineers ASCE, 2010). Este tema ha sido ampliamente estudiado en las últimas décadas por diversos autores como, por ejemplo: Akta et al, 2001;Ang, 2011;Mitropoulou et al, 2011;Lagaros, 2007;Wen y Kang, 2001a, 2001bBaron y Frangopol, 2015;Esteva et al, 2011;Montiel y Ruiz, 2007; sin embargo, estás metodologías están generalmente limitadas a la aplicación de algunos ejemplos particulares. El costo total, como se trata aquí, incluye el costo inicial y el costo por daños causados por futuros sismos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Researchers [7,8] have already emphasized the use of nonlinear analysis procedures in estimating the structural capacities of the existing and retrofitted structures subjected to various earthquake loads. Pushover analysis is generally applied to regular structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%