2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life-cycle assessment of emerging CO2 mineral carbonation-cured concrete blocks: Comparative analysis of CO2 reduction potential and optimization of environmental impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strengths attained for brick in this study, i.e., 7.8-20.0 N/mm 2 , are in line with other cement-based products partially made of waste materials such as fly ash (6.75 N/mm 2 ) [ In terms of CO 2 sequestration performance, the findings are also comparable with some other studies, such as the improvement in material strength after carbonation, e.g., with 2-18 h carbonation time [45], 4 h carbonation [46] and 1-14 d carbonation curing [44,83]. Application-wise, various cement-based products have been studied as potential CO 2 sink for carbon capture and storage, e.g., concrete [44,83], cement-bonded fibreboards [45], cement boards [12], concrete blocks [42,84] and cement mortar [84]. It has been found from the previous studies that the CO 2 uptake of the carbonated products were 2-3.5% (concrete) [85], 9.8-14.1% (concrete) [44], 20% (cement fibreboards) [45], 9.4-13.9% (cement mortar) [46], 24% (concrete blocks/bricks) [42], while it was between 0.4 and 1.3% in this study (cement-sand bricks fabricated with carbonation curing at ambient pressure and temperature).…”
Section: Carbon Capture and Storage In Cementitious Productsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The strengths attained for brick in this study, i.e., 7.8-20.0 N/mm 2 , are in line with other cement-based products partially made of waste materials such as fly ash (6.75 N/mm 2 ) [ In terms of CO 2 sequestration performance, the findings are also comparable with some other studies, such as the improvement in material strength after carbonation, e.g., with 2-18 h carbonation time [45], 4 h carbonation [46] and 1-14 d carbonation curing [44,83]. Application-wise, various cement-based products have been studied as potential CO 2 sink for carbon capture and storage, e.g., concrete [44,83], cement-bonded fibreboards [45], cement boards [12], concrete blocks [42,84] and cement mortar [84]. It has been found from the previous studies that the CO 2 uptake of the carbonated products were 2-3.5% (concrete) [85], 9.8-14.1% (concrete) [44], 20% (cement fibreboards) [45], 9.4-13.9% (cement mortar) [46], 24% (concrete blocks/bricks) [42], while it was between 0.4 and 1.3% in this study (cement-sand bricks fabricated with carbonation curing at ambient pressure and temperature).…”
Section: Carbon Capture and Storage In Cementitious Productsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A significant reserve of raw materials in the production of building materials and products hardening due to carbon dioxide are various wastes and industrial waste products, which at certain technological processing can exhibit bindering properties and enter into chemical interaction with carbon dioxide, forming an artificial stone. As a result of numerous research studies [11][12][13][14][15], a number of kinds of the secondary raw materials possessing the essential potential for CО 2 binding have been revealed, scientific and technological bases for introduction of the received results in the industry have been developed [13][14][15][16], and moreover, pilot batches of the building products hardened in the environment of the raised concentration of CО 2 have been issued [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to storing carbon, the CO 2 -cured building elements may offer reductions of global warming potential (GWP). Huang et al (2019b) conducted a life-cycle assessment of several different concrete blocks that had been cured with CO 2 . Their findings suggest that the GWP of a CO 2 -cured Wollastonite-Portland cement (WPC) block can be approximately 30% lower than in typical steam-cured concrete block made with ordinary Portland cement (OPC).…”
Section: Carbon Captured and Utilized For Co 2 -Cured Concretementioning
confidence: 99%