“…The strengths attained for brick in this study, i.e., 7.8-20.0 N/mm 2 , are in line with other cement-based products partially made of waste materials such as fly ash (6.75 N/mm 2 ) [ In terms of CO 2 sequestration performance, the findings are also comparable with some other studies, such as the improvement in material strength after carbonation, e.g., with 2-18 h carbonation time [45], 4 h carbonation [46] and 1-14 d carbonation curing [44,83]. Application-wise, various cement-based products have been studied as potential CO 2 sink for carbon capture and storage, e.g., concrete [44,83], cement-bonded fibreboards [45], cement boards [12], concrete blocks [42,84] and cement mortar [84]. It has been found from the previous studies that the CO 2 uptake of the carbonated products were 2-3.5% (concrete) [85], 9.8-14.1% (concrete) [44], 20% (cement fibreboards) [45], 9.4-13.9% (cement mortar) [46], 24% (concrete blocks/bricks) [42], while it was between 0.4 and 1.3% in this study (cement-sand bricks fabricated with carbonation curing at ambient pressure and temperature).…”