1982
Lidocaine in the Treatment of Tinnitus Aurium: A Double-blind Study
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
61
5
3
1
Citation Types
0
29
0
5
Year Published
1983
2024
Publication Types
Select...
51
10
3
Relationship
0
64
Authors
Journals
Cited by 64 publications
(34 citation statements)
References 7 publications
0
29
0
5
“…The percentage of patients who improved was similar to the earlier studies already reported. Similarly, in a placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study, Israel et al 13 reported tinnitus improvement in 19of 26 patients. Interestingly, two patients in the series believed their tinnitus was worse after the injection and all patients reported temporary side effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The percentage of patients who improved was similar to the earlier studies already reported. Similarly, in a placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study, Israel et al 13 reported tinnitus improvement in 19of 26 patients. Interestingly, two patients in the series believed their tinnitus was worse after the injection and all patients reported temporary side effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Israel et a1. 13 also found the integrity of their double-blind crossover protocol potentially compromised by similar adverse reactions. Other investigators have not reported similar side effects following injection of lidocaine.4.9•12 This difference in results is difficult to explain, given the similarity between the experimental protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similar concern was expressed by Israel et al" (1982), who believed that their double-blind protocol had been compromised by similar adverse effects. For these reasons we elected to investigate the contribution of a placebo effect in the management of tinnitus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In addition to being concerned about the bias inher-ent in single-blind protocols, we were concerned that the high incidence of side effects we observed could have biased our own results. Similar concern was expressed by Israel et al" (1982), who believed that their double-blind protocol had been compromised by similar adverse effects. For these reasons we elected to investigate the contribution of a placebo effect in the management of tinnitus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Historically, perhaps the most effective treatment for tinnitus was intravenous lidocaine which transiently decreased tinnitus in 70% of patients. 52 However, due to the limited duration of symptom relief and potentially fatal side effect profile, this treatment was never adopted. 53 Various treatments including cognitive behavioral therapy, sound maskers, hearing aids, medications, hyperbaric oxygen, acupuncture, and neuromodulation have failed to show definitive evidence of reducing tinnitus loudness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
