2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icra48506.2021.9561466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LiDAR few-shot domain adaptation via integrated CycleGAN and 3D object detector with joint learning delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These splits are chosen deterministically using dataset sampling parameters available in the OpenPCDet [29] base code that we use in this paper. To avoid introducing domain shifts [18], [19], [20] between the dataset splits due to resampling of the point clouds at the input, we apply the resampling R(P, ⃗ θ) to both, the training and validation splits. We train and evaluate each detector on all of the following object classes: Waymo: {vehicle, pedestrian, cyclist}, ONCE: {car, bus, truck, pedestrian, cyclist}.…”
Section: A Experiments With Different 3d Object Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These splits are chosen deterministically using dataset sampling parameters available in the OpenPCDet [29] base code that we use in this paper. To avoid introducing domain shifts [18], [19], [20] between the dataset splits due to resampling of the point clouds at the input, we apply the resampling R(P, ⃗ θ) to both, the training and validation splits. We train and evaluate each detector on all of the following object classes: Waymo: {vehicle, pedestrian, cyclist}, ONCE: {car, bus, truck, pedestrian, cyclist}.…”
Section: A Experiments With Different 3d Object Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1: mAP for Centerpoint 3D object detector [7] trained/evaluated on Waymo point clouds with and without random sampling with 50% keep percentage on distance range [0-10] m. We computed mAP separately for different distance ranges, and observed that performace improved at farther away ranges, which suggests the existence of a learning bias toward the closer denser objects. Domain adaptation methods [18], [19], [20] have been used as a form of data augmentation by shifting the distribution of a large labeled source training dataset into that of a small target dataset to increase the amount of training data. Recent GAN-based object-level shape completion methods [21], [22], [23] have also been used to either complete occluded point clouds, or manipulate their distribution to attempt improving performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%