2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020wr027183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LIDA: A Land Integrated Data Assimilation Framework for Mapping Land Surface Heat and Evaporative Fluxes by Assimilating Space‐Borne Soil Moisture and Land Surface Temperature

Abstract: Land surface heat and evaporative fluxes exchanged between the land and atmosphere play a crucial role in the terrestrial water and energy balance. Regional mapping of these fluxes is hampered by the lack of in situ measurements (with the required coverage and duration) and the high spatial heterogeneity. In this paper, we propose a Land Integrated Data Assimilation framework (LIDA) based on the variational data assimilation technique to estimate the key parameters of surface heat and evaporative fluxes by joi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(142 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third‐sixth terms represent the difference between R , EF S , EF C , and c g estimations and their prior values, respectively. In the six study sites, values of 0.01, 0.7, 0.7, and 0.01 are used as the initial guess for C HN , EF S , EF C , and c g , respectively (Abdolghafoorian & Farhadi, 2020; Bateni et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014). The VDA obtains the optimal magnitudes of C HN , EF S , EF C , and c g by minimizing the difference between the LST and LAI estimates and their corresponding observations.…”
Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third‐sixth terms represent the difference between R , EF S , EF C , and c g estimations and their prior values, respectively. In the six study sites, values of 0.01, 0.7, 0.7, and 0.01 are used as the initial guess for C HN , EF S , EF C , and c g , respectively (Abdolghafoorian & Farhadi, 2020; Bateni et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2014). The VDA obtains the optimal magnitudes of C HN , EF S , EF C , and c g by minimizing the difference between the LST and LAI estimates and their corresponding observations.…”
Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of the gradient of the cost function in VDA/adjoint method is very efficient as it is independent of the number of unknown parameters and requires only a single simulation of the model forward in time and a single simulation of adjoint model backward in time (e.g. [47], [69]- [73]. However, the integration of the adjoint of a large scale model backward in time may require several forward model simulations that increases the computational burden and expense of this technique [74]- [76].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ground-based observations of this flux are sparsely available both in spatial and temporal scales due to cost and difficulty of in-situ measurement [13]. It is not possible to extend these data to large areas due to land surface heterogeneity and dynamic nature of transfer processes [14]- [16]. Direct measurement of recharge can be made by using lysimeters, seepage meters, and chemical tracers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdolghafoorian and Farhadi [1], [14] developed a framework known as land integration data assimilation (LIDA) framework that resolved the two shortcomings of VDA-based heat and evaporative fluxes retrieval by i) coupling water and energy balance model and ii) estimating the uncertainty of parameters and fluxes to guide it toward well-posed optimization problem. They assimilate the SM data into moisture diffusion equation in addition to assimilating LST into heat diffusion equation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation