2003
DOI: 10.3184/030823403103173020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LiClO4-Catalysed C-Alkylation of Pyrrole and Indoles with Aziridines and Epoxides

Abstract: Aryl- N-tosylaziridines and epoxides smoothly undergo ring-opening with pyrrole and indoles in the presence of 5M lithium perchlorate in diethyl ether (LPDE) at ambient temperature to afford the corresponding 2- and 3-alkylated pyrroles and 3-alkylated indoles in high yields with high selectivity. LiOTf is also found to be an effective catalyst for this transformation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All reactions occurred without any loss in the enantiomeric enrichment of the products, and the relative stereochemistry of 7 was tentatively assigned as 1,4‐ trans by means of NOE experiments. Furthermore, the formation of the sulfonamide derivative 6 allowed the assignment of the absolute configuration of the catalytic product 4 a as 2 R , from the comparison of its optical rotation and HPLC retention time with those of an authentic sample of ent ‐ 6 (in 94 % ee ), which was synthesized by the ring‐opening at the benzylic position of (2 S )‐2‐phenyl‐1‐ p ‐toluenesulfonyl aziridine19 with indole 2 a promoted by LiClO 4 20…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All reactions occurred without any loss in the enantiomeric enrichment of the products, and the relative stereochemistry of 7 was tentatively assigned as 1,4‐ trans by means of NOE experiments. Furthermore, the formation of the sulfonamide derivative 6 allowed the assignment of the absolute configuration of the catalytic product 4 a as 2 R , from the comparison of its optical rotation and HPLC retention time with those of an authentic sample of ent ‐ 6 (in 94 % ee ), which was synthesized by the ring‐opening at the benzylic position of (2 S )‐2‐phenyl‐1‐ p ‐toluenesulfonyl aziridine19 with indole 2 a promoted by LiClO 4 20…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effectively overcomes the potential ecological hazards arising from the use of novel environmentally toxic surfactants (SDS, SDBS, etc.). 13 In fact, it was reported in the literature that RuCl 3 ÁnH 2 O as catalyst could give the 3-alkylindole product in 82% yield in the absence of solvent, but the amount of ethylene oxide fed was greatly excessive (3.7 times that of the indole substrate); not only the expensive precious metal salt catalyst was used in large amounts (5 mol %) and difficult to recover, but also the reaction time was as long as 6 h. 31 In traditional liquid phase solvents (CH 2 Cl 2 and CH 3 CN), the catalysts that efficiently catalyse the nucleophilic ring-opening reaction of indole and styrene oxide are LiClO 4 , 32 InCl 3 33 and other expensive waterresistant catalysts. [34][35][36] The degree of greenness is extremely low and it is difficult to promote application.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the ring‐opening of aziridines with heteroatomic nucleophiles, such as alcohols, amines, thiols, and azides, is widespread, the Friedel–Crafts reaction of electron‐rich arenes is less well‐developed . In an early report, LiClO 4 was shown to efficiently promote this reaction, but with limited substrate scope, whilst the use of InCl 3 as a catalyst gave the products as a mixture of regioisomers . A dual‐catalyst system that consisted of Sc(OTf) 3 /Zn(OTf) 2 (Tf=trifluoromethanesulfonyl) was used in a single example of a ring‐opening reaction between aziridines and indoles, but the product was accompanied by an unidentified by‐product .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%