2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0266467417000153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liana density declined and basal area increased over 12 y in a subtropical montane forest in Argentina

Abstract: Abstract:Changes in density and basal area of lianas ≥2 cm diameter were monitored in two 1-ha permanent plots in a subtropical montane mature forest of north-western Argentina. Liana stems were identified and measured at 130 cm from the main rooting point in two censuses conducted in 2003 and 2015. Between censuses, the density of liana stems decreased 13.3%, while basal area increased 11.5%. Density and basal area decreased mainly among lianas of 2–3 cm diameter, but increased in lianas ≥4 cm diameter. Quech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(102 reference statements)
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We provide evidence that bamboo density and basal area represent a substantial fraction of the total basal area per plot in Andean forests (mean 0.85 m 2 /ha, maximum 2.9 m 2 /ha). Bamboo basal area in our example data from the Peruvian Andes is comparable to the basal area represented by lianas, for example, 1.00 m 2 /ha in the lowland tropical forest of La Selva, Costa Rica (Yorke, Schnitzer, Mascaro, Letcher, & Carson, ), 0.78 m 2 /ha in a subtropical montane forest in Argentina (Ceballos & Malizia, ), 0.74 m 2 /ha in a seasonally moist lowland tropical forest in Barro Colorado Island, Panama (Schnitzer et al, ) and 1.9 m 2 /ha in a seasonal lowland forest in Bolivia (Pérez‐Salicrup, Sork, & Putz, ). We hope that these results, together with the literature reporting the effect of bamboo on forest structure, composition and function (e.g., Caccia, Kitzberger, & Chaneton, ; Campanello et al, ; González, Veblen, Donoso, & Valeria, ; Griscom et al, ; Muñoz, González, Celedón, & Veblen, ; Rother et al, ; Tabarelli & Mantovani, ), will motivate others to monitor bamboo in their forests following our proposed bamboo protocol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We provide evidence that bamboo density and basal area represent a substantial fraction of the total basal area per plot in Andean forests (mean 0.85 m 2 /ha, maximum 2.9 m 2 /ha). Bamboo basal area in our example data from the Peruvian Andes is comparable to the basal area represented by lianas, for example, 1.00 m 2 /ha in the lowland tropical forest of La Selva, Costa Rica (Yorke, Schnitzer, Mascaro, Letcher, & Carson, ), 0.78 m 2 /ha in a subtropical montane forest in Argentina (Ceballos & Malizia, ), 0.74 m 2 /ha in a seasonally moist lowland tropical forest in Barro Colorado Island, Panama (Schnitzer et al, ) and 1.9 m 2 /ha in a seasonal lowland forest in Bolivia (Pérez‐Salicrup, Sork, & Putz, ). We hope that these results, together with the literature reporting the effect of bamboo on forest structure, composition and function (e.g., Caccia, Kitzberger, & Chaneton, ; Campanello et al, ; González, Veblen, Donoso, & Valeria, ; Griscom et al, ; Muñoz, González, Celedón, & Veblen, ; Rother et al, ; Tabarelli & Mantovani, ), will motivate others to monitor bamboo in their forests following our proposed bamboo protocol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We found a significant decrease in lianas abundance over the 13‐yr time period in Ituri forest. This decrease is in line with the overall liana decline in the two other African forests evaluated (Caballé and Martin 2001, Thomas et al 2015) but contrasts with the general increase of lianas in the Neotropics (Phillips et al 2002, Schnitzer and Bongers 2011, Laurance et al 2014, Schnitzer 2015, Ceballos and Malizia 2017, Hogan et al 2017; but see Smith et al 2017, Geralomo et al 2018) and an increase (Pandian and Parthasarathy 2015) and a relatively stable population (Wright et al 2015) in Asia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In fact, 4.22 PgC could be accumulated in that same time period if only 10% of current Neotropical pasture area would be allowed to return to forests and if 60% of the secondary forests are allowed to persist (Chazdon et al ). Aside from socio‐economic aspects, this huge potential could be thwarted for three key reasons related to lianas: (1) Lianas may be increasing in tropical forests, especially in the Neotropics (Schnitzer , Pandian and Parthasarathy , Ceballos and Malizia , Hogan et al ), (2) lianas recruit rapidly in early successional forests (Letcher and Chazdon , Barry et al , Lai et al ), and (3) lianas reduce biomass accumulation significantly in secondary forests (our results, van der Heijden et al , Schnitzer et al , van der Heijden et al , Lai et al ). If future forecasts of carbon accumulation and carbon sinks were to increase in accuracy, they should integrate into their calculations the strength by which lianas reduce tree biomass across young secondary forests (di Porcia e Brugnera et al , Schnitzer et al , Verbeeck and Kearsley ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of lianas on forest regeneration in tropical forests may be much stronger now than in previous decades because lianas are increasing in abundance and biomass in neotropical forests (Schnitzer ). There are now 15 studies demonstrating that liana density, productivity, and biomass are all increasing relative to trees in tropical forests (Schnitzer , Pandian and Parthasarathy , Ceballos and Malizia , Hogan et al ). Liana density has increased in forests in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Costa Rica, French Guiana, India, and Panama.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%