2016
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20165907006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LFM Radar Convolution Jamming Suppression Based on Oblique Projection in FrFT Domain

Abstract: Abstract. Convolution false-targets jamming against LFM fire-control radars generates range and velocity false targets which are coherent with target echo, which increases the difficulty of jamming detection and suppression and makes the victim radar system lost the track of real target. To combat against this type of jamming, the uncorrelated characteristic between the jamming and echo in FRFT domain is discussed firstly. Thus, an oblique projection operator which is capable of suppress convolution false-targ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to effectively measure the performance of interference suppression methods, it is necessary to establish an evaluation criterion for interference suppression. We use the signal‐to‐interference‐plus‐noise ratio improvement factor (SINRIF) [7] as the evaluation index and then, based on that, define the evaluation criteria for interference suppression. The mathematical expression of SNIRIF is as follows: leftrightleftSNIRIF=10log10Xfalse(tfalse)2Xˆfalse(tfalse)Xfalse(tfalse)2rightleft10log10Xfalse(tfalse)2Sfalse(tfalse)Xfalse(tfalse)2, \begin{align*}\hfill & \mathrm{S}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{R}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{F}=10\,{\log }_{10}\left(\frac{\sum {\left\vert X(t)\right\vert }^{2}}{\sum {\left\vert \widehat{X}(t)-X(t)\right\vert }^{2}}\right)\hfill \\ \hfill & -10\,{\log }_{10}\left(\frac{\sum {\left\vert X(t)\right\vert }^{2}}{\sum {\left\vert S(t)-X(t)\right\vert }^{2}}\right),\hfill \end{align*} where X ( t ) is the target signal, trueXˆ(t) $\widehat{X}(t)$ is the recovered signal.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to effectively measure the performance of interference suppression methods, it is necessary to establish an evaluation criterion for interference suppression. We use the signal‐to‐interference‐plus‐noise ratio improvement factor (SINRIF) [7] as the evaluation index and then, based on that, define the evaluation criteria for interference suppression. The mathematical expression of SNIRIF is as follows: leftrightleftSNIRIF=10log10Xfalse(tfalse)2Xˆfalse(tfalse)Xfalse(tfalse)2rightleft10log10Xfalse(tfalse)2Sfalse(tfalse)Xfalse(tfalse)2, \begin{align*}\hfill & \mathrm{S}\mathrm{N}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{R}\mathrm{I}\mathrm{F}=10\,{\log }_{10}\left(\frac{\sum {\left\vert X(t)\right\vert }^{2}}{\sum {\left\vert \widehat{X}(t)-X(t)\right\vert }^{2}}\right)\hfill \\ \hfill & -10\,{\log }_{10}\left(\frac{\sum {\left\vert X(t)\right\vert }^{2}}{\sum {\left\vert S(t)-X(t)\right\vert }^{2}}\right),\hfill \end{align*} where X ( t ) is the target signal, trueXˆ(t) $\widehat{X}(t)$ is the recovered signal.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to effectively measure the performance of interference suppression methods, it is necessary to establish an evaluation criterion for interference suppression. We use the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio improvement factor (SINRIF) [7] as the evaluation index and then, based on that, define the evaluation criteria for interference suppression. The mathematical expression of SNIRIF is as follows: SNIRIF ¼ 10 log 10 And we calculate 10log10 {⋅} to obtain SNIRIF values in decibels.…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main shortcoming of this method lies in the time consuming computation of the Wigner-Ville Distribution Hough Transform (WVD-HT) [11]; in addition, the initial phase of the signal is lost during the transform, and therefore it cannot be estimated from the detection statistics. In recent years, a new time-frequency analysis tool-fractional Fourier transform [12]- [15] attracts more and more attention in signal processing society. In 1980, Namias first introduced the mathematical definition of the FRFT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%