Level of diagnostic agreement in musculoskeletal shoulder diagnosis between remote and face‐to‐face consultations: A retrospective service evaluation

Abstract

Background and AimsTo determine the level of diagnostic agreement between remote and face‐to‐face consultation in assessing shoulder complaints.MethodsA retrospective service evaluation with three groups of patient data; those assessed only face‐to‐face (group 1), remotely then face‐to‐face (group 2), remotely only (group 3). Patient data were extracted from 6 secondary care shoulder Advanced Physiotherapy Practitioner's (APPs) records, covering six sites. Three‐hundred‐and‐fifty‐nine sets of patient data were included in the final evaluation. The main outcome measure was the percentage of agreement between diagnosis at initial and follow‐up consultation, when assessed by APPs across the three groups. A Pearson χ2 test was used to assess the relationship between the method of consultation and the level of diagnostic agreement. Diagnoses were categorized as either the same, similar, or different by an independent APP. Secondary outcome measures investigated whether age or the length of time between appointments had any effect in determining the level of diagnostic concordance.ResultsThere was exact agreement of 77.05% and 85.52% for groups 1 and 3, respectively, compared with 34.93% for patient data in group 2. Similar clinical impressions across both initial and follow‐up were seen 16.39% of the time in group 1, 7.24% of the time in group 3, and 36.99% in group 2. Lastly, the percentage of times a diagnosis was changed between initial and review appointments occurred in only 6.56% of group 1 contacts, 7.24% of group 3 contacts, but 28.08% of the time in group 2.ConclusionThere was a large mismatch in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal shoulder complaints, when patients are initially assessed remotely and then followed‐up in‐person. This has implications for the future provision of shoulder assessment in physiotherapy.