2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.04.098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 mutants I2020T and G2019S exhibit altered kinase inhibitor sensitivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that the I2020T mutant exhibits resistance toward ATP competitive inhibitors due to its small K ATP (49). We were able to replicate this finding using an ATP competitive inhibitor GSK3-XIII (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…It has been reported that the I2020T mutant exhibits resistance toward ATP competitive inhibitors due to its small K ATP (49). We were able to replicate this finding using an ATP competitive inhibitor GSK3-XIII (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Other kinase inhibitors have recently been reported to inhibit LRRK2 kinase activity with similar potency to those described here 1215. Since an authentic substrate of LRRK2 has yet to be identified, there should be a note of caution regarding the physiological relevance of the screens used in this and related studies based on autophosphorylation and artificial substrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The finding that the LRRK2[G2019S] mutant was 2–4-fold more sensitive H-1152, Y-27632 and sunitinib than the wild-type LRRK2 also indicates that it may be possible to develop compounds that have greater potency towards the PD mutant. It has also been reported that the LRRK2[G2019S] and LRRK2[I202T] mutants that possess elevated activity were also moderately more sensitive to a panel of non-selective kinase inhibitors [40]. If compounds that specifically inhibited PD mutant forms of LRRK2 could be elaborated, they might have lower side effects and not suppress the normal functions of wild-type LRRK2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%