2023
DOI: 10.1111/apt.17407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter: tricky reactions to switch back from subcutaneous to intravenous vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease patients—authors' reply

Abstract: LINKED CONTENT This article is linked to Volkers et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17153 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17395

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Safety concerns have been raised regarding switch back to IV once being established on SC treatment. 22 , 23 In the present study, 4 patients switched back to IV due to ISRs, and 3 of these patients experienced AEs at consecutive infusions, 1 case leading to discontinuation of VDZ. Our observations are consistent with observations made by Volkers et al, where 1 out of 4 patients switching back to IV due to ISRs had to discontinue VDZ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Safety concerns have been raised regarding switch back to IV once being established on SC treatment. 22 , 23 In the present study, 4 patients switched back to IV due to ISRs, and 3 of these patients experienced AEs at consecutive infusions, 1 case leading to discontinuation of VDZ. Our observations are consistent with observations made by Volkers et al, where 1 out of 4 patients switching back to IV due to ISRs had to discontinue VDZ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“… 4 , 5 , 15–18 Yet, recently published reports disclosed that some patients with AEs on SC VDZ, experienced AEs also when switching back to IV treatment. 22 , 23 Thus, further safety data when switching back to IV VDZ are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%