2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-020-03144-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Let’s Talk About Sex: The Impact of Partnership Contexts on Communication About HIV Serostatus and Condom Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) and Transgender Women (TW) in Lima, Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This result may be situated within prior Peruvian literature, as previous work has found partner notification practices to vary with factors such as partnership type (in relation to perceived risks and benefits of notification as well as ability to contact partners), type of STI diagnosed (HIV or other STIs), perception of peer support for notification, and fear of rejection or interpersonal violence [29][30][31]. It is notable that participants reported low levels of HIV serostatus communication with sexual partners in a separate analysis from this same study cohort, as our finding regarding social support for partner STI notification may reflect broader reticence in sexual communication norms [23]. We did not observe an association between close SNM attitudes or characteristics and participant-reported CAI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result may be situated within prior Peruvian literature, as previous work has found partner notification practices to vary with factors such as partnership type (in relation to perceived risks and benefits of notification as well as ability to contact partners), type of STI diagnosed (HIV or other STIs), perception of peer support for notification, and fear of rejection or interpersonal violence [29][30][31]. It is notable that participants reported low levels of HIV serostatus communication with sexual partners in a separate analysis from this same study cohort, as our finding regarding social support for partner STI notification may reflect broader reticence in sexual communication norms [23]. We did not observe an association between close SNM attitudes or characteristics and participant-reported CAI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Prior research with this cohort has suggested that CAI is frequent and sexual communication with partners, limited [23]; thus, understanding the social environments experienced by these communities may provide insight into positive and negative influences on sexual behavior and opportunities for intervention [15]. In this analysis, we aimed to characterize key social network members (SNMs) within the social networks of Peruvian MSM and trans women; explore perceptions of SNM opinions toward sexual health behaviors; and examine associations of SNM attitudes and characteristics with CAI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Para el diseño de cada uno de los reactivos de las dos escalas, se siguió el procedimiento de Reyes-Lagunes (1993). Primero, se formaron dos grupos de hombres con diagnóstico de vih y hombres sin el diagnóstico, debido a que en la literatura se ha reportado que el conocimiento del estado serológico influye en la manera en que se comunican con la pareja, así como en el comportamiento sexual (Ayer et al, 2021;Damian et al, 2019;Gursahaney et al, 2019;Hass et al, 2017;Ncube, et al, 2017). El análisis se realizó en hojas de cálculo en Excel.…”
Section: Análisis De Resultadosunclassified
“…En el caso particular de hsh en que es más frecuente la comunicación sobre vih, es entre quienes se identifican como heterosexuales, que entre los que se consideran bisexuales o gais (Ayer et al, 2021). Dentro de los hsh también hay diferencias en términos del diagnóstico de vih, por ejemplo, los estereotipos y el estigma del vih es mayor en vih positivos y esto influye en la poca comunicación con la pareja sexual (Haas et al, 2020), de igual forma, como mencionan Grimm y Schwartz (2021), la comunicación es fundamental para que los hsh tengan conductas preventivas, por ejemplo, se ha observado que hsh que se comunican más con su pareja tienen menores conductas de riesgo sexual (Afriyanti et al, 2020;Crosby et al, 2016;Gause, et al, 2018;Lo et al, 2011).…”
Section: Quinnunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation