“…The 1 H NMR spectrum of 1 has peaks indicating an aromatic ring AA′BB′ system [ δ H 7.04 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-2′, 6′) and δ H 6.62 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-3′, 5′)], one nitrogen-bearing methylene [ δ H 4.72 ( 1 H, d, J = 15.0 Hz, H-7′a) and 4.61( 1 H, d, J = 15.0 Hz, H-1′b)], one saturated methylene [ δ H 2.41 ( 1 H, dd, J = 6.0, 13.2 Hz, H-9a) and 1.95 ( 1 H, dd, J = 7.2, 13.2 Hz, H-9b)], two nonequivalent methines [ δ H 3.85 ( 1 H, dq, J = 6.0, 6.0 Hz, H-7) and 3.83 ( 1 H, ddd, J = 7.2, 6.0, 6.0 Hz, H-8)], and one methyl [ δ H 1.09 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H 3 -10)]. The 13 C NMR and DEPT spectra display signals corresponding to the above proton-bearing units include two additional quaternary carbonyls assigned as carboxylic ( δ C 172.9, C-4), and thiourea carbonyl ( δ C 182.6, C-2) groups [ 3 , 8 , 9 ], and three quaternary carbon resonances that were assigned as two aromatic carbons, including an oxygen-bearing carbon ( δ C 126.9 and 157.3, respectively) and one nitrogen/oxygen-bearing carbon ( δ C 90.7) ( Table 1 ). These spectroscopic data, and those of the reported thiohydantoin derivatives (Lee et al, 2019; Peng et al, 2021; Yu et al, 2017) indicate that 1 is a thiohydantoin derivative, as confirmed by 2D NMR data analysis ( Figure 2 ).…”