2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42832-020-0066-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legacy effect of elevated CO2 and N fertilization on mineralization and retention of rice (Oryza sativa L.) rhizodeposit-C in paddy soil aggregates

Abstract: Rhizodeposits in rice paddy soil are important in global C sequestration and cycling. This study explored the effects of elevated CO 2 and N fertilization during the rice growing season on the subsequent mineralization and retention of rhizodeposit-C in soil aggregates after harvest. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) was labeled with 13 CO 2 under ambient (400 ppm) and elevated (800 ppm) CO 2 concentrations with and without N fertilization. After harvest, soil with labeled rhizodeposits was collected, separated into thre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(91 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a greater accumulation of MBP and MBC in finer aggregates (<0.053 mm) than in macroaggregates in karst forests (Table 1), which is consistent with the observations by Dorodnikov and Li [68,69]. The accumulation of MBC in finer aggregate fractions is usually due to higher specific surfaces for microbial habitats and greater protections of microorganisms from predation by protozoa or from desiccation, which help in stabilizing microbial residues [69,70] and may cause high levels of C sequestration in karst forests. MBP accumulated more in finer aggregates in both karst (<0.053mm and 0.053-0.25mm) and non-karst (<0.053 mm) ecosystems for the same reason.…”
Section: Effect Of Soil Properties On Individual Enzyme Activity In Karst and Non-karst Forestssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We observed a greater accumulation of MBP and MBC in finer aggregates (<0.053 mm) than in macroaggregates in karst forests (Table 1), which is consistent with the observations by Dorodnikov and Li [68,69]. The accumulation of MBC in finer aggregate fractions is usually due to higher specific surfaces for microbial habitats and greater protections of microorganisms from predation by protozoa or from desiccation, which help in stabilizing microbial residues [69,70] and may cause high levels of C sequestration in karst forests. MBP accumulated more in finer aggregates in both karst (<0.053mm and 0.053-0.25mm) and non-karst (<0.053 mm) ecosystems for the same reason.…”
Section: Effect Of Soil Properties On Individual Enzyme Activity In Karst and Non-karst Forestssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Plants modify the soil environment either by releasing C from their roots (e.g., root exudates) or by the rapid uptake of nutrients from the soil by their associated microorganisms (Kuzyakov, 2002; Jones et al, 2009; Fisk et al, 2015; Liu et al, 2019; Xiong et al, 2019; Li, Ge, et al, 2020; Li, Yuan, et al, 2020). Across different plant species, around 1%–10% of photoassimilated C is released into the soil as root exudates (Jones et al, 2004; Phillips et al, 2011; Qiao et al, 2014; Yin et al, 2014), which consist primarily of sugars, but can also include phenolics, amino acids, organic acids, and other metabolite derivatives (Haichar et al, 2014; Yuan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how root exudates affect the microbial decomposition of soil organic matter (SOM). It has been hypothesized that (i) root exudates provide energy for stimulating SOM decomposition and changing the chemical and physical characteristics of the soil environment (Qiao et al, 2016; Zhu, Ge, Liu, et al, 2018; Zhu, Ge, Luo, et al, 2018; Mehnaz et al, 2019; Du et al, 2020., Liu et al, 2022); (ii) labile C promotes microbial growth, which in turn, increases the N demand and microbial N mining from SOM (Manzoni et al, 2010; Qiao et al, 2016; Zhu, Ge, Liu, et al, 2018; Zhu, Ge, Luo, et al, 2018); and (iii) microbial C and N demand causes community shifts that alter microbial‐mediated C decomposition (Phillips et al, 2011; Wild et al, 2014; Li, Ge, et al, 2020; Li, Yuan, et al, 2020; Xu et al, 2020; Wei et al, 2022). Moreover, the impact of nutrients on CN stoichiometry need to be considered, such as the addition of C substrates like glucose, and the different several levels of N application, which provide a proportion of C that is integrated into the microbial biomass that becomes stabilized as SOM with the cost of CO 2 emission (Creamer et al, 2014; Liu, Ge, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Complex biogeochemical processes facilitate specific C sequestration mechanisms in paddy soils (Ge et al, 2012; Li et al, 2021; Liu, Ge, et al, 2019). The organic carbon (OC) storage in paddy soils primarily occurs through the combined action of (i) physical protection of aggregates (Li et al, 2020), (ii) sorption by and precipitation on iron (Fe) (oxyhydr)oxides, (iii) chemical stability of the OC molecular structure, and (iv) slow decomposition of OC under anoxic conditions (Wei, Ge, et al, 2021). For example, the physicochemical protection of OC arises through bonding and aggregation with amorphous Fe (oxyhydr)oxides and aluminum oxides (Wissing et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%