2017
DOI: 10.1080/19434472.2017.1299782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaving ideological groups behind: A model of disengagement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…59 In this contribution it refers to a declining commitment to ideological groups' belief systems as a result of dissonance. 60 Data indicated that like belief reaffirmation, disengagement among participants had both a discursive and behavioral dimension. On the discursive level, disengagement notably manifested through participants' condemnation of ISIS's methods and through their reinterpretation of what "doing jihad" meant.…”
Section: Disengagementmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…59 In this contribution it refers to a declining commitment to ideological groups' belief systems as a result of dissonance. 60 Data indicated that like belief reaffirmation, disengagement among participants had both a discursive and behavioral dimension. On the discursive level, disengagement notably manifested through participants' condemnation of ISIS's methods and through their reinterpretation of what "doing jihad" meant.…”
Section: Disengagementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…65 While the data did not allow for the drawing of conclusions on whether participants had indeed experienced initial doubts or were rather motivated by social desirability (or both), they seemed to no longer perceive the identity they derived from their involvement in extremist milieus as desirable, either because they did not identify anymore with ISIS's norms and values or because the demise of the Caliphate made ISIS membership far less attractive. 66 Claiming to have experienced doubts at the same time allowed them to morally disengage from ISIS's actions and methods, and thus to present themselves in a way that was more acceptable to outsiders (and potentially more consistent with their present self-concept). 67 While participants reported having experienced initial doubts toward ISIS's legitimacy, they at the same time continued to adhere to jihadi ideals.…”
Section: Disengagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the process of leaving ideological social groups—such as radical groups ( Demant et al 2008 ) and militant extremist groups ( Bjørgo and Horgan 2009 ; Bjørgo 2011 )—also point to disillusionment as the main source of disengagement. In an overview of the literature on gangs, violent extremist and religious groups, Harris (2015) discerns several individual factors leading to disengagement. Firstly, disillusionment is fed by normative factors like losing faith in the group’s ideology, frustrations about the lack of success, or being confronted with violence.…”
Section: Leaving Gangs: the Role Of Disillusionmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, disillusionment is fed by normative factors like losing faith in the group’s ideology, frustrations about the lack of success, or being confronted with violence. Secondly, Harris (2015) describes affective components causing disillusionment due to failing group organization or inadequate leadership. Continuance factors, lastly, are practical life circumstances such as maturation, competing social relationships, external pressures, and stigmatization that may lead to disillusionment ( Harris 2015 ).…”
Section: Leaving Gangs: the Role Of Disillusionmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then much has happened. A number of studies have begun to shed light on processes of disengagement and deradicalization from terrorism, both collective and individual (for example, Ashour 2009; Bjørgo and Horgan 2009; Dalgaard-Nielsen 2013; El-Said 2015; Gunaratna and Bin Ali 2015; Harris, Gringart, and Drake 2017; Horgan 2009; Hwang 2015; Koehler 2016a). International organizations, governments and high-level governance bodies have started to involve countering violent extremism (CVE) practices and terrorist rehabilitation programs in their own counter-terrorism strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%