2011
DOI: 10.1080/18377122.2011.9730343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from leisure: Developing nature connectedness in outdoor education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, to accommodate for the quantitative bias towards cognitive connections, interviewees' responses were analyzed along multiple dimensions of human-nature connectedness in several studies (e.g. Guiney and Oberhauser 2009;Cosgriff 2011;Silvas 2013;Materia 2016). Unlike surveys, interviews allow for a conversational inquiry into highly personal terms such as 'connectedness' (Cosgriff et al 2009;Zylstra et al 2014), resolving potential unclarities about the research process and its results for both the researcher and the interviewees (Klassen 2010).…”
Section: Existing Research On Human-nature Connectednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, to accommodate for the quantitative bias towards cognitive connections, interviewees' responses were analyzed along multiple dimensions of human-nature connectedness in several studies (e.g. Guiney and Oberhauser 2009;Cosgriff 2011;Silvas 2013;Materia 2016). Unlike surveys, interviews allow for a conversational inquiry into highly personal terms such as 'connectedness' (Cosgriff et al 2009;Zylstra et al 2014), resolving potential unclarities about the research process and its results for both the researcher and the interviewees (Klassen 2010).…”
Section: Existing Research On Human-nature Connectednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of outdoor learning, when learners feel fulfilment of the need for relatedness towards the practitioner and the group, they are more likely to integrate the values of that group, which are pointing strongly towards environmentally-friendly and sustainable behaviors in nature. Both close contact with nature and nature connectedness facilitate the development of such attitudes towards the environment (Cosgriff 2011;Lugg 2007).…”
Section: Relatednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environment, it is argued, provides care as well as receives it (Buser et al, 2018; Larson et al, 2015; O'Shaughnessy & Kennedy, 2010; Siegel et al, 2018). Caring for the environment is a result of love and connectedness with the environment (Cosgriff, 2011). This focus on relationships and interaction, ‘deep caring’ (Diniz & de Quieroz Pinheiro, 2017; Fien, 2003), is stronger in environmental research than in care work theory.…”
Section: Care and Its Underpinning Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%