2017
DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1394103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leaking, leak prevention, and decoupling in public administrations: the case of the European Commission

Abstract: The European Commission is frequently faced with leaks, much like other public administrations in Western democracies. While executive leaders often criticise the practice of leaking as an unwanted breach of confidentiality and secrecy, leak prevention is usually not taken seriously compared to the scale of the phenomenon. This article discusses leaking and leak prevention more broadly and analyses the efforts of the European Commission to prevent leaks. It finds that leaking and leak prevention were regularly… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Na visão de Patz (2018), o decoupling serve ao propósito de organizar sistemas de valores conflitantes, dentro e fora da administração, e para garantir o funcionamento eficaz de uma organização que precisa reconciliar vários objetivos e interesses concorrentes. Ou seja, a dissociação entre as normas e ação de atores públicos é decorrente da existência de conflito de valores dentro das organizações públicas.…”
Section: Asaaunclassified
“…Na visão de Patz (2018), o decoupling serve ao propósito de organizar sistemas de valores conflitantes, dentro e fora da administração, e para garantir o funcionamento eficaz de uma organização que precisa reconciliar vários objetivos e interesses concorrentes. Ou seja, a dissociação entre as normas e ação de atores públicos é decorrente da existência de conflito de valores dentro das organizações públicas.…”
Section: Asaaunclassified
“…Others shared whatever was not labelled 'limite'. The Commission occasionally requested Council members not to engage in informal document disclosure outside of official access procedures, but its own inconsistent policy encouraged a relaxed attitude towards document sharing (respondents #13, #14, #15;Patz, 2018Patz, , p. 1057.…”
Section: Environment Council Transparency Policy: Playing Beyond the Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the same time as state and private actors hold ever-increasing amounts of data, information, and knowledge about the public, the technical ability of public institutions to keep data, information, and knowledge secret appears to be fundamentally challenged by professionalised hacking, leaking, and whistle-blowing, as exemplified by WikiLeaks and the Snowdon affair. As Patz (2018) shows, taking effective steps against leaking is difficult and may not even be a shared ambition within organisations that have formal codes in place to prevent it.…”
Section: Technological Change and The Data Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ronny Patz (2018) analyses organisational practices that demonstrates the reverse case: secrecy is officially mandated, but its deliberate breach is rarely sanctioned. He explores the phenomenon of information leaks in the European Commission and asks why, despite the threat of sanctions, the Commission is not successful in stopping this practice, and hence the spreading of 'secrets' continues and is considered common practice.…”
Section: Organisational Perspective: Secrecy and Organised Hypocrisymentioning
confidence: 99%