2022
DOI: 10.1109/tqe.2021.3140190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layer VQE: A Variational Approach for Combinatorial Optimization on Noisy Quantum Computers

Abstract: IEEE Transactions on Quantum EngineeringDate of publication xxxx 00, 0000, date of current version xxxx 00, 0000.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another procedure that has shown promising results is layer wise learning [33,30]. Layers in a quantum circuit are trained one at a time, keeping all other layers fixed.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another procedure that has shown promising results is layer wise learning [33,30]. Layers in a quantum circuit are trained one at a time, keeping all other layers fixed.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of the standard QAOA scheme, we use a brick wall circuit made up of independent 2-qubit gates. These sorts of circuits have been explored for optimisation problems and their performance is competitive with QAOA [30].…”
Section: Combinatorial Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QAOA solves the combinatorial optimization problem of finding the bitstring corresponding to the lowest energy eigenstate of a Hamiltonian [17]. Performance of QAOA has been improved by exploiting symmetries of graph structures [18]- [21], by introducing classical neural networks or other classical methods to assist in parameter optimization [22], [23], by modifying the circuit ansatz [24]- [26], and by increasing circuit parameterization, at the expense of increased classical optimization [27]. Although increasing the number of independent parameters in QAOA circuits can improve performance in some instances, as the number of parameters increases, nonconvex optimization landscapes can hamper parameter optimization [28]- [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such hardware include adiabatic quantum computers [19], complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) annealers [1] and coherent Ising machines [17]. The gatebased universal quantum computers can also be used to solve such optimization problems [26]. These novel technologies are all unified by an ability to solve the Ising model or, equivalently, the quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%