2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-020-00852-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Layer-specific analysis of femorotibial cartilage t2 relaxation time based on registration of segmented double echo steady state (dess) to multi-echo-spin-echo (mese) images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Femorotibial cartilage thickness segmentation in the FNIH Biomarker study relied on sagittal double‐echo steady‐state (DESS) imaging, with blinding to group assignment and order of acquisition ( 1 ). To extract cartilage T2, existing cartilage segmentations of the DESS (see Supplementary Figure 1 , available on the Arthritis Care & Research website at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.24627 ) were registered to the MESE MRIs using a recently validated algorithm ( 14 ). The segmentations comprised the entire medial tibia (MT) and lateral tibia (LT) and the central (weight‐bearing) part of the medial femoral (cMF) and lateral femoral (cLF) condyles, defined as 75% of the distance between the intercondylar notch and the posterior end of the condyles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Femorotibial cartilage thickness segmentation in the FNIH Biomarker study relied on sagittal double‐echo steady‐state (DESS) imaging, with blinding to group assignment and order of acquisition ( 1 ). To extract cartilage T2, existing cartilage segmentations of the DESS (see Supplementary Figure 1 , available on the Arthritis Care & Research website at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.24627 ) were registered to the MESE MRIs using a recently validated algorithm ( 14 ). The segmentations comprised the entire medial tibia (MT) and lateral tibia (LT) and the central (weight‐bearing) part of the medial femoral (cMF) and lateral femoral (cLF) condyles, defined as 75% of the distance between the intercondylar notch and the posterior end of the condyles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segmentations comprised the entire medial tibia (MT) and lateral tibia (LT) and the central (weight‐bearing) part of the medial femoral (cMF) and lateral femoral (cLF) condyles, defined as 75% of the distance between the intercondylar notch and the posterior end of the condyles. The registration process required automated trimming of the DESS segmentations in the joint periphery and in the depth of the cartilage because we discovered an underestimation of the total cartilage thickness by the MESE ( 14 ). The quality of the registration results was validated visually and quantitatively by checking the final Mattes Mutual Information metrices ( 15 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR thermometry as an alternative approach suffers from a coarse temperature resolution [22]. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in MRI [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] has opened up new avenues for the prediction of various imaging characteristics, among them the recent prediction of local SAR in prostate imaging [37][38][39][40], as well as the prediction of temperature rise in the brain for 33 different tissue types [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have used image registration to transfer the segmentation of morphological images to corresponding MESE images of the same patient taken in succession. [24][25][26][27][28] However, registration can be imperfect, partially due to the potential for non-affine movements of the knee throughout the acquisition time of the two images (e.g., flexion or extension of the joint or compression of soft tissues). The risk of patient movement and registration error may be higher when the time between the acquisition of the morphological image and T2 image is longer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have used image registration to transfer the segmentation of morphological images to corresponding MESE images of the same patient taken in succession [17][18][19] . However, registration can be imperfect, partially due to the potential for non-affine movement of the knee throughout the acquisition time of the two images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%