1999
DOI: 10.3133/pp1591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lava Falls Rapid in Grand Canyon: Effects of Late Holocene debris flows on the Colorado River

Abstract: Lava Falls Rapid is the most formidable reach of whitewater on the Colorado River in Grand Canyon and is one of the most famous rapids in the world. Once thought to be controlled o River floods (less than 3,540 m /s) removed most of the deposition at the mouth of Prospect Canyon within 3 years after debris flows in 1939, 1954, and 1955. Releases in 1965 from Glen Canyon Dam that were above powerplant capacity but less than 1,640 m3/s removed most of the debris fan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most debris fl ows occur in summer (Webb et al, 1989(Webb et al, , 1999(Webb et al, , 2000, when convective thunderstorms yield intense rainfall (Hereford and Webb, 1992;Hereford et al, 2002). Webb et al (2000) report no relation between debrisfl ow occurrence in Grand Canyon and total seasonal precipitation; instead, they hypothesize that debris-fl ow occurrence is better related to wet periods where antecedent soil moisture can accumulate over short (~1-week) periods.…”
Section: Infl Uence Of Rainfall Distribution and Intensitymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most debris fl ows occur in summer (Webb et al, 1989(Webb et al, , 1999(Webb et al, , 2000, when convective thunderstorms yield intense rainfall (Hereford and Webb, 1992;Hereford et al, 2002). Webb et al (2000) report no relation between debrisfl ow occurrence in Grand Canyon and total seasonal precipitation; instead, they hypothesize that debris-fl ow occurrence is better related to wet periods where antecedent soil moisture can accumulate over short (~1-week) periods.…”
Section: Infl Uence Of Rainfall Distribution and Intensitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…2D). Debris fl ows with lower clay contents (~1% or less), such as those that occur at Prospect Canyon in Grand Canyon (Webb et al, 1999), fl ow short distances before losing too much mass to sustain boulder transport. Certain units of fi ne-grained bedrock fail readily, either producing debris fl ows directly or storing sediment to colluvial deposits, which can fail later.…”
Section: Infl Uence Of Sediment Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have described the rapids that dominate the river corridor of Grand Canyon [ Leopold , 1969; Howard and Dolan , 1981; Kieffer , 1987]. Other researchers have more fully documented the role of debris flows in the creation and maintenance of debris fans and rapids [ Cooley et al , 1977; Webb , 1996; Webb et al , 1989, 1999a, 2003; Melis et al , 1994]. Given their episodic nature, debris flows result in large modifications to debris fans and associated rapids over very short time periods, in most cases minutes to hours [ Webb et al , 1988, 1999a].…”
Section: Debris Flows and The Colorado River In Grand Canyonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers have more fully documented the role of debris flows in the creation and maintenance of debris fans and rapids [ Cooley et al , 1977; Webb , 1996; Webb et al , 1989, 1999a, 2003; Melis et al , 1994]. Given their episodic nature, debris flows result in large modifications to debris fans and associated rapids over very short time periods, in most cases minutes to hours [ Webb et al , 1988, 1999a]. River reworking of newly aggraded debris fans, which was extensive on the unregulated river [ Melis , 1997], occurs on a limited basis on the regulated Colorado, typically during maximum power plant releases or intentional flood releases from Glen Canyon Dam [ Webb et al , 1999b].…”
Section: Debris Flows and The Colorado River In Grand Canyonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation