2015
DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2015.1042357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latitudinal, longitudinal and weather-related variation in breeding parameters of Great Reed Warblers in Europe: a meta-analysis

Abstract: Clutch size generally decreases with latitude from the poles towards the Equator (Bell 1996, 38 Sanz 1999, Cardillo 2002, Cooper et al. 2005, Jetz et al. 2008, Griebeler et al. 2010, Winkler 39 et al. 2014. Griebeler et al. (2010) and Jetz et al. (2008) The Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus, a western Palearctic species breeding in 57 reed Phragmites australis habitats, is suitable for such investigations because its breeding 58 biology is well described from several locations in Europ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such climatic impacts have not only effects in a local population of a species; the weather influences nesting success of birds along latitudinal and longitudinal geographical gradients (e.g. Cooper et al 2005, Mérő et al 2015a. Beside weather circumstances, ecological disturbances can change ecosystem and community structure, and influence resources, substrate availability and/or the physical environment (White & Pickett 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such climatic impacts have not only effects in a local population of a species; the weather influences nesting success of birds along latitudinal and longitudinal geographical gradients (e.g. Cooper et al 2005, Mérő et al 2015a. Beside weather circumstances, ecological disturbances can change ecosystem and community structure, and influence resources, substrate availability and/or the physical environment (White & Pickett 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many papers confuse the resource seasonality (intra‐annual variation) that underlies Ashmole's mechanism with other sources and scales of environmental variability, including: inter‐annual variability (Gibb, 1968) or stochasticity (Møller, 1984), productivity (Thomas et al ., 1999), absolute food availability (Simmons, 1993; Li & Lu, 2012; Mérő, Žuljevic & Lengyel, 2015), environmental variability (Engen & Saether, 2016), stability, or predictability (Horn, 2012). Many of these works (Gibb, 1968; Tarburton, 2009; Burski, 2011; Gill & Haggerty, 2012; Horn, 2012; Heming & Marini, 2015) equate or conflate Ashmole's mechanism with Cody's (1966, 1971) hypothesis to explain clutch size evolution and the mechanism underlying r ‐ K selection theory (MacArthur, 1962; Pianka, 1970), on which Cody's ideas were directly based.…”
Section: Interpretations and Confusion In The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%