2012
DOI: 10.1002/gea.21387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Holocene Sea Level Reconstructions Based on Observations of Roman Fish Tanks, Tyrrhenian Coast of Italy

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
51
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Morhange et al (2013) use Roman fish tanks in combination with biological markers to state a relative rise in sea level of 40 ± 10 cm since those days for the region of Fr ejus, southeastern France. Similar work is published, e.g., by Evelpidou et al (2012) for the Tyrrhenian Coast of Italy, by Mourtzas (2012) for the Greek island of Crete, and by Florido et al (2011) for the Istrian and Dalmatian coast, Italy and Croatia. Ship sheds in contrast to fish tanks cannot bear direct witness of former sea level because they have been built above the marine sphere but in close vicinity to it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Morhange et al (2013) use Roman fish tanks in combination with biological markers to state a relative rise in sea level of 40 ± 10 cm since those days for the region of Fr ejus, southeastern France. Similar work is published, e.g., by Evelpidou et al (2012) for the Tyrrhenian Coast of Italy, by Mourtzas (2012) for the Greek island of Crete, and by Florido et al (2011) for the Istrian and Dalmatian coast, Italy and Croatia. Ship sheds in contrast to fish tanks cannot bear direct witness of former sea level because they have been built above the marine sphere but in close vicinity to it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This is usually carried out by dating, measuring their elevation relative to the present sea-level, defining their function and determining their potential use as sea-level markers (Flemming 1969;Blackman 1973;Galili et al 1988Galili et al , 2005Galili & Sharvit 1998;Sivan et al 2001Sivan et al , 2004Lambeck et al 2004;Antonioli et al 2006;Auriemma & Solinas 2009;Anzidei et al 2011;Evelpidou et al 2012;Stanley & Bernasconi 2012). In addition to the original observations made on archaeological features during this study and presented in this work, we also reevaluated previous studies that dealt with such indicators along the coasts of Cyprus (e.g.…”
Section: Archaeological Features As Sea-level Markersmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It is assumed that the bottom of these pools must have been at a certain depth underwater to enable functioning, and that the feeding channels and sluice gates were not to be washed by the sea. Several studies have already interpreted past sea-level conditions on the basis of rock-cut coastal fish tanks (Dreghorn 1981;Auriemma & Solinas 2009;Evelpidou et al 2012). The lower the fish-tank entrance is, the more seawater it gets, but then it is exposed to flushing: and, vice versa, the higher the entrance to the fish tank, the less seawater it gets, but it is safer.…”
Section: Archaeological Features As Sea-level Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of any extended foundation was documented by core ELA 41 ( Figure 4A, 5A) and by nine sediment cores that explored the sedimentary context of the underwater structures ( Figure 2B). An interpretation as piscinae-artificial fish ponds-is also improbable as those installations are by far smaller, of another layout and a different building technique than the wall structures in the Bay of Elaia (Higginbotham, 1997;Grüner, 2006;Evelpidou et al, 2012;Morhange et al, 2013). We conclude that a utilisation as harbour infrastructures, shipyards, breakwaters or other solid structures can be excluded.…”
Section: What Was the Function Of The Underwater Structures?mentioning
confidence: 85%